Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW
Bad.

Businesses should not be allowed to impose certain terms and conditions on their employees. "Non-compete" is one of those conditions.

The relationship between employer and employee is inherently unequal and businesses tend to do everything they can to impose "contracts of adhesion" unless curbed.

A free market in labor would fix such problems. Businesses tend to do everything they can do to prevent a free market in labor.

It is not that business executives are inherently bad. It is that the incentives and greatest profits go to the ones who are bad, unless they are restrained by laws and customs.

I am not in favor of this court ruling.

5 posted on 08/20/2024 9:09:22 PM PDT by flamberge (It turns out that you can fool most of the people, most of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: flamberge

This ruling has nothing to do with declaring non-compete rulings good, bad, or indifferent. It shuts down an unlawful action by a Federal agency that didn’t follow its own rules

For that reason this ruling is to be applauded. If Congress wants to ban non-compete agreements they can pass a law and send it to the President for his signature. But for a President to simply order it and command some faceless bureaucrats to write a rule for the entire nation flies in the face of the Constitution.

L


8 posted on 08/20/2024 9:18:31 PM PDT by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: flamberge

The politicized federal courts have gotten the populace used to the idea that results I agree with are correct rulings, and vice versa. This court properly found that the making of this rule was outside the agency’s powers. If you want this to be the law, lobby Congress to make it the law, rather than imposing it via the fiat of unelected bureaucrats


12 posted on 08/20/2024 9:23:30 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (23 years on Free Republic, 12/10/23! More than 8,000 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: flamberge

I have to agree with you.

Markets should be free.

The ground should be level.


17 posted on 08/20/2024 10:02:22 PM PDT by Westbrook (The Democrats are wizards at two things: Finding votes and losing evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: flamberge
Sometimes you've just got to think ... "What would Ayn Rand say?"
25 posted on 08/20/2024 10:47:20 PM PDT by The Duke (Not without incident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: flamberge
The whole non compete thing would be unnecessary if the employer was paying market wages. Apparently the are not.
33 posted on 08/21/2024 2:51:42 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: flamberge

Contracts come under state law, not federal law. It’s not a question of whether non-compete agreements are good or bad on their merits. It’s a simple matter of whether a federal agency should have any role in them at all.


36 posted on 08/21/2024 3:48:45 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (“Ain't it funny how the night moves … when you just don't seem to have as much to lose.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: flamberge
The relationship between employer and employee is inherently unequal

So?

Don't like it, be your own boss.

40 posted on 08/21/2024 4:33:03 AM PDT by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: flamberge

“Businesses should not be allowed to impose certain terms and conditions on their employees”.

- You are not a slave and you are not compelled by force to work for any given employer so how is anything being imposed? If you don’t like the terms and conditions look elsewhere for a job.

“The relationship between employer and employee is inherently unequal”

- Sometimes the employer will have the upper hand and at others the employee will have the upper hand. No relationship is inherently equal or unequal. No one forces anyone to enter into an unequal relationship.

Want to have the upper hand? work for an idiot at subpar wages. You will have the supper hand. Want to work without a noncompete? then find an employer who will view you and compensate you as a future competitor.

“It is not that business executives are inherently bad. “

- All people are inherently bad or do you believe in the innate goodness of people? Humans are born in need of redemption into a fallen world. Employers are no more or less “inherently” bad than anyone else. Including the “inherently” bad employee.


45 posted on 08/21/2024 8:27:51 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson