Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court shuts down Missouri’s long shot push to lift Trump’s gag order in hush-money case
AP via MSN ^ | August 5, 2024 | LINDSAY WHITEHURST

Posted on 08/05/2024 4:15:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday shut down a long-shot push from Missouri to remove a gag order in former President Donald Trump’s hush-money case and delay his sentencing in New York.

The Missouri attorney general went to the high court with the unusual request to sue New York after the justices granted Trump broad immunity from prosecution in a separate case filed in Washington.

The order states that Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito would have allowed Republican Andrew Bailey to file the suit, though not grant his push to quickly lift the gag order and delay sentencing.

Bailey argued the New York gag order, which Missouri wanted stayed until after the election, wrongly limits what the GOP presidential nominee can say on the campaign trail around the country, and Trump's eventual sentence could affect his ability to travel.

“The actions by New York have created constitutional harms that threaten to infringe the rights of Missouri’s voters and electors,” he wrote.

Bailey railed against the charges as politically motivated as he framed the issue as a conflict between two states. While the Supreme Court typically hears appeals, it can act as a trial court in state conflicts. Those disputes, though, typically deal with shared borders or rivers that cross state lines.

New York, meanwhile, said the limited gag order does allow Trump to talk about the issues important to voters, and the sentence may not affect his movement at all. Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James argued that appeals are moving through state courts and there’s no state-on-state conflict that would allow the Supreme Court to weigh in at this point.

“Allowing Missouri to file this suit for such relief against New York would permit an extraordinary and dangerous end-run around former President Trump’s...

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri; US: New York
KEYWORDS: fakenews

1 posted on 08/05/2024 4:15:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Question: What is this kink?


2 posted on 08/05/2024 4:20:43 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yeah, only the State of New York is allowed to prosecute “LONG SHOT” cases against a former president!


3 posted on 08/05/2024 4:20:57 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

One of the few specific things the Constitution spells out that the Supreme Court is responsible for is disputes between states. This Court, under the corrupt Roberts, has refused to accept that responsibility, not only in this case but in the 2020 election case between states.


4 posted on 08/05/2024 4:29:35 PM PDT by falcon99 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Is this the case they are hushing Trump up from talking about paying hush money.


5 posted on 08/05/2024 4:33:55 PM PDT by Leep (She cackles in you general direction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Terrible written article.

But now Missouri just needs to get a judge to order a gag order against Kamala. Then see how it works out.


6 posted on 08/05/2024 4:39:43 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Here is the unsigned Order

“Missouri’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied, and its motion for preliminary relief or a stay is dismissed as moot. Justice Thomas and Justice Alito would grant the motion for leave to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief.”

7 posted on 08/05/2024 4:44:23 PM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Trump & Vance, 2024! (Formerly) Goldwater & Thomas Sowell in 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

State prosecutes former president for bookkeeping entry, made by someone else, using private $, for an NDA politicians, celebrities, old money types commonly use to settle their own embarrassing claims with taxpayer $. One payment then becomes 34 separate felonies.

State silences the accused from defending himself before or during trial, unless he’s put on the stand and lead into a perjury trap. State’s case falls apart, makes no sense to even lefty lawyers, and much of evidence used was inadmissible because the acts were immune from prosecution.

State now silences defendant while it sends him for ‘sentencing’. 90 days before election. Accused is landslide favorite. No politician before has had such restrictions, or been prosecuted, for the same NDA’s.

Pray you are never targeted by the State.


8 posted on 08/05/2024 4:58:54 PM PDT by TonyinLA (I don't have sufficient information to formulate a reasoned opinion said no lefty ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Exactly!!


9 posted on 08/05/2024 5:05:37 PM PDT by Racketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It would have worked better if someone from NYS had brought the lawsuit, but who’s left? Pataki? D’Amato (if he’s still alive)?


10 posted on 08/05/2024 6:45:04 PM PDT by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

“But now Missouri just needs to get a judge to order a gag order against Kamala.”

You know, it would take a big attorney general with a very hard case to gag Kamala. She’s had a lot of practice licking such situations.


11 posted on 08/05/2024 9:38:26 PM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

12 posted on 08/06/2024 8:25:09 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Putin should skip ahead to where he kills himself in the bunker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson