Skip to comments.
In an attempt to reverse the Supreme Court’s immunity decision, Schumer introduces the No Kings Act
The Associated Press ^
| August 1, 2024
| Mary Clare Jakonick
Posted on 08/01/2024 10:58:49 AM PDT by Trump20162020
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Trump20162020
Someone should tell Schecky that this is a Bill of Attainder.
2
posted on
08/01/2024 11:00:29 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(FR Democrat Party operatives! Rally in defense of your Colombian cartel stooge Merchan!)
To: Trump20162020
3
posted on
08/01/2024 11:01:22 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(FR Democrat Party operatives! Rally in defense of your Colombian cartel stooge Merchan!)
Where's the Beef, Schecky?
4
posted on
08/01/2024 11:02:04 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(FR Democrat Party operatives! Rally in defense of your Colombian cartel stooge Merchan!)
To: Trump20162020
Meanwhile the Democrat delegates get to pick Harris or Harris or Harris.
No Kings.
Lol.
5
posted on
08/01/2024 11:02:38 AM PDT
by
cgbg
("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
To: Trump20162020
Chuck should be in Gitmo for refusing to prosecute the Mayorkas impeachment in the Senate as the US Constitution demands.
To: Trump20162020
Interesting how the "Legislative" branch is suddenly concerned with "reigning in" Judicial Branch "oversteps".
Pound sand, Chuck.
Pound it every day, all day long, for the rest of your life. However long the deal you made with Moloch gives you.
7
posted on
08/01/2024 11:04:21 AM PDT
by
Frank Drebin
(And don't ever let me catch you guys in America!)
To: Trump20162020
Considering the depth & breadth of the BIDEN CRIMINAL CORRUPTION FAMILY BUSINESS-—the Dems should STHU
8
posted on
08/01/2024 11:06:37 AM PDT
by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: Trump20162020
There’s got to be a conservative DA somewhere who is willing to indict Biden and Harris for various (real) crimes.
Because as it is now, only one side is playing hardball.
9
posted on
08/01/2024 11:10:26 AM PDT
by
Leaning Right
(The steal is real.)
To: Trump20162020
There is nothing even remotely accurate with the actual supreme court decision. The media and Dems totally lie about what it actually was.
10
posted on
08/01/2024 11:11:02 AM PDT
by
pas
To: Trump20162020
He should call it the “Deep State Empowerment Act”
11
posted on
08/01/2024 11:11:09 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Trump20162020
Is this headline from the Bee?
There’s mass insanity infecting the Democrat Party.
12
posted on
08/01/2024 11:14:07 AM PDT
by
Deo volente
("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
To: Trump20162020
Nothing, absolutely nothing or nobody stops the communists from adding new links in the heavy chains of tyranny around our necks at every opportunity...
While the American peasants blissfully sleep, the communists continue to trample over them and the former Constitution...
13
posted on
08/01/2024 11:14:14 AM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
( Where is Samuel Adams when we so desperately need him)
To: Trump20162020
14
posted on
08/01/2024 11:15:05 AM PDT
by
Pearfect
(Ou can't beat the competition lock them )
To: kiryandil
We poor uncultured slobs just don’t understand hamburgers tartare.
To: Trump20162020
16
posted on
08/01/2024 11:19:07 AM PDT
by
bray
(It's not racist to be racist against races the DNC hates.)
To: kiryandil
So if this No Kings Act were to actually pass, couldn’t SCOTUS just rule it unconstitutional?
17
posted on
08/01/2024 11:19:41 AM PDT
by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: Trump20162020
Trump should get elected and introduce the “Schumer Act: Term Limits”
18
posted on
08/01/2024 11:20:05 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
To: chaosagent
19
posted on
08/01/2024 11:21:36 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(FR Democrat Party operatives! Rally in defense of your Colombian cartel stooge Merchan!)
To: Trump20162020
This is totally about fund-raising from the party faithful.
20
posted on
08/01/2024 11:24:41 AM PDT
by
Thud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson