Posted on 07/29/2024 4:54:59 PM PDT by Reno89519
Lauran Ingraham has been interviewing President Trump for most of the hour.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I am currently listening via Sirius/XM. If you have Fox you can watch, I’ll post replay when I find it.
Its a good interview only thing is that he is not committed to debating her..which I dont understand why..he could debate her and win, not sure why he is hesitating to do so, Tulsi did it and beat her easily its not that hard to debate Harris I could do it
Hey Reno-Laura’s doing her Brit Hume thing. Questioning everything and interrupting. She’s trying to impress someone.
Pretty normal, not as bad as Chickenhawk Hannity, but yeah, she’s interrupting him. At a few points I think it was maybe trying to nudge him to finish an answer. He sometimes doesn’t have short concise answers.
I’m trying to figure that one out too. In the interview he even went further than past, suggesting we all know everything, so no need to debate. Is that where he’s going now?
Agreeing to debate her maybe validating her as the dem nominee.
They haven’t had the convention yet & who knows will come out of that wrestle royale as the dem candidate??
Technically, the delegates are free agents. So Harris is not the nominee until confirmed at the Convention.
That was his earlier position, which made sense when he said let’s wait until the Democrats confirm a nominee. But that’s not what he’s saying now.
He has to debate her otherwise he looks like a chicken..I dont get it, she honestly is NOT hard to debate..I could do it easily just bring up her agenda thats it that simple..Maybe he’s afraid if he says something especially to a “woman of color” he will be called a racist..so he’s hesitate on doing it..heck this man survived a bullet to the head he can debate this chick he can beat her
Laura did fine, I think she was just trying to get an answer from him..I didnt mind how she did the interview..with Trump sometimes he tends to not answer the question right away, he will talk about other things and work his way back to the original question
Also, Trump doesn’t need to debate. She does. If there is a debate, it will be on his terms.
Agreed!
He said he backed out because it was unclear as to her being the nominee. When she becomes the official nominee he will debate her.
Its not like this is his first time debating a woman, he debated Hillary, who is sorta a chick and he did just fine..but maybe he worries with a “woman of color” he has to be on top of things and be careful of what he says..he shouldnt be, if they believe in equity like they say they do than he should go after her like anyone else..bring up her record, her agenda, many dont even know what her agenda is that is the problem
That is what he was previously saying and that made perfect sense. That is NOT what he’s saying today. Take a listen as it was a long answer but a very different answer.
Whoever is running the Democrat Party wanted Joe Biden to lose that debate so they could put him out to pasture.
That is the ONLY reason the moderators did not intervene on Biden’s behalf.
That is the ONLY reason the fake news did not spin it as a Biden win in the days that followed.
Don’t expect a repeat of that in any Trump/Harris debate.
Besides, President Trump is the frontrunner - debates favor the underdog.
Maybe my memory is foggy but what did Laura say regarding the 2016 Republican primaries? The 2020 rigged election? The fake pandemic?
Who’s side is she on?
I put Laura in the category of the TV people who think they are smarter than Trump.
He will debate her since she is a very weak debater. He will blow her apart with her rediculous beliefs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.