Plausible deniability?

American Thinker ^ | July 28, 2024 | Mike McDaniel

[NorthernDancer]

On July 18, in Trump attempt: why didn’t they shoot?, I suggested the government, in its Secret Service (SS) pseudo-protection of Donald Trump, was creating security vulnerabilities with plausible deniability. Were those vulnerabilities due to Trump Derangement Syndrome? Were those creating them doing it purposely with the hope someone would exploit them and kill Trump? Were they simply practicing contemporary Democract/socialist/communist (D/s/c) politics, playing hardball, and doing all they could to harass and hamper Trump without necessarily hoping he’d be killed? Or was the 20-year-old a doomed patsy, manipulated from the beginning, part of an assassination plot that would allow plausible deniability? Cops hate to be called incompetent and will do virtually anything to avoid it—unless the alternative is worse. Was someone willing to allow the SS to look like total idiots to rid themselves of Trump?

[NorthernDancer]

This is the key point: “Cops hate to be called incompetent and will do virtually anything to avoid it—unless the alternative is worse. Was someone willing to allow the SS to look like total idiots to rid themselves of Trump?”

[Lion Den Dan]

will take a “Plot,” for $100. I think the thread runs all the way through the oval office. Friends put a director in place who organized her TDS afflicted minions for the performance. The shooter was one of a number of actors held in the wings, waiting for their cue.

[null and void]

Once the patsy was dead, the professional snipers lost their cover and held off (to shoot another day?).

[reviled downesdad]

The deep state knows all. They just arrested militants bent on attacking the nw power grid, but they let this assassin have free reign in Butler.

[PghBaldy]

Article wrong in first sentence! The shooting was on July 13.