To: The_Media_never_lie
Yes there is a difference.
A candidate is not afforded the same level of SS as a sitting POTUS......
3 posted on
07/14/2024 11:41:17 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: Red Badger
A candidate is not afforded the same level of SS as a sitting POTUS......
__________________
There is either security which is adequate, or there isn’t. This was “pretend” security. Trump can afford real security and should provide his own. This “pretend security” was a national disgrace.
To: Red Badger
I would say that if they didn’t have the best site for an assassin covered then they were worse than having no security at all.
I don’t think this was just that there was less security. I think this was that the security they had DID NOT DO THEIR FREAKING JOB!
To: Red Badger
The individual is not saying the same security as a sitting president; he is saying it was not the same security as other Trump rally’s he has been to.
35 posted on
07/14/2024 11:58:05 AM PDT by
falcon99
( )
To: Red Badger
Trump is not a typical candidate.
A reasonable person would assume the level of protection should overmatch the level of the threat to some degree.
If the objective is to actually protect a person. That is the objective, right?
55 posted on
07/14/2024 12:07:36 PM PDT by
Sarcazmo
(I live by the Golden Rule. As applied by others; I'm not selfish.)
To: Red Badger
67 posted on
07/14/2024 12:14:08 PM PDT by
Churchillspirit
(Pray for President Trump)
To: Red Badger
90 posted on
07/14/2024 12:23:06 PM PDT by
TheConservator
(To bar Trump from the presidency, libtards are happy to trash 235 years the rule of law)
To: Red Badger
FBI agent Frank Figliuzzi said.....
....."During 25 years with the FBI, I have seen how countless similar rallies were organised and I consider it highly likely that the Secret Service was responsible for security within an 'enclosed perimeter', while the 'local police' took charge of the wider zone outside.".......What we don't yet know is 'whose job' it was to ensure this roof, only 150 yards from the stage, was secure."
Responsibility for every post, every zone, every rooftop needs to be clearly assigned and this division of roles should have been clear to everyone.....This is standard practice for the Secret Service but it's also potentially new territory for each local police department.
102 posted on
07/14/2024 12:29:58 PM PDT by
caww
(O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......)
To: Red Badger
A candidate is not afforded the same level of SS as a sitting POTUS......I have attended rallies for Presidential Candidates before. The SS presence was very heavy and every manhole and every rooftop were manned with agents.
126 posted on
07/14/2024 12:42:33 PM PDT by
gitmo
To: Red Badger
“A candidate is not afforded the same level of SS as a sitting POTUS......”
***************
But in this case the candidate is a former POTUS. The security should not be a whole lot different.
To: Red Badger
Trump is not just a candidate; he is also a former POTUS.
To: Red Badger
Lol, well that explains it.
173 posted on
07/14/2024 2:26:12 PM PDT by
Trailerpark Badass
(“There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach,” said one woman)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson