Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lake appeals to have courts reconsider 2022 gubernatorial case
The Hill ^ | 07/12/2024 | CAROLINE VAKIL

Posted on 07/12/2024 2:21:06 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

Kari Lake is appealing to the Arizona Supreme Court to have the courts reconsider her case over her 2022 gubernatorial election loss to Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) after a panel on the Court of Appeals tossed out her case last month.

Lawyers for Lake wrote in their filing, obtained by Arizona’s Law, that a new election should be conducted or 275,000 ballots should be struck, which would deliver a victory for Lake, after claiming that “based on new information,” a majority of vote center tabulators in Maricopa County failed and “averaging over 7,000 ballot rejections every thirty minutes shortly after polls opened to polls closing.”

The lawsuit claims that, “Maricopa did not conduct pre-election logic and accuracy (“L&A”) testing” “on any vote center tabulators used on Election Day” and that Maricopa County allegedly had evidence before Election Day of faulty vote center tabulators but didn’t fix the problem beforehand.

Lake has refused to concede the results of the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election, where she narrowly lost to Hobbs by less than 20,000 votes. The former local news anchor has filed multiple lawsuits over the results, though they’ve largely been rejected by the courts.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2022; appeals; arizona; guebernatorial; karilake; lake
Thoughts concerns?
1 posted on 07/12/2024 2:21:06 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I always felt she should have followed Carlson, Logan.


2 posted on 07/12/2024 2:29:11 PM PDT by waterhill (I Believe! Eph. 5:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Lake has refused to concede the results of the 2022 Arizona gubernatorial election, where she narrowly lost to Hobbs by less than 20,000 votes. The former local news anchor has filed multiple lawsuits over the results, though they’ve largely been rejected by the courts.

There was a woman who testified before the Arizona Senate that every important office in the State of Arizona was controlled by the Sinola drug cartel.

The behavior we've seen from the Judges and from the Election officials make this claim seem very credible to me.

Arizona is apparently a corrupt state.

3 posted on 07/12/2024 2:30:44 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
As a resident of Arizona at the time of the 2020 elections, I am certain that she is right. Hobbs had no business being Sec of State while being a candidate and making all the decisions that favored her.

The vote travesty was a mirror image of the national scam, sudden reasons to sequester vote counting, magic car trunks full of found votes, the whole mess. Sinema also won on the coattails of that corruption.

The question I have in all this is what if Lake wins the appeal? On the plus side we get a new election and possibly it will be less corrupt. On the downside look at the damage Hobbs has done and how can that be undone?

4 posted on 07/12/2024 2:46:43 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

There’s also the court-acknowledged failure to perform signature verification on the mail-in ballots.


5 posted on 07/12/2024 3:30:03 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

A Supreme Court reconsidering their recent ruling almost never happens. It usually takes a lot, with a dramatic effect, to convince them that what they thought ‘last week’ is now possibly wrong.


6 posted on 07/12/2024 3:40:06 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I’m guessing they will admit she won after the term is over when it is too late to undo.


7 posted on 07/12/2024 3:58:01 PM PDT by Reno89519 (I'll go out on a limb: Trump & Gabbard 2024 or Trump & Sanders 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Sounds about right. However, the claim that there was no election fraud will not be able to be shouted from the rooftops any longer.


8 posted on 07/12/2024 6:24:05 PM PDT by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pfflier

“What if Lake wins the appeal?”

You really think that could happen with these courts?


9 posted on 07/12/2024 6:31:02 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
You really think that could happen with these courts?

Not a chance. But the question was "What would happen if she did win?"

10 posted on 07/12/2024 7:16:31 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson