Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court’s Chevron overturn a victory for the little guy, not for big business
New York Post ^ | July 4, 2024 | Jacob Sullum

Posted on 07/04/2024 7:43:48 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

After the US Supreme Court curtailed the powers of federal agencies in two cases last week, progressive critics predictably complained that the decisions favored “big business,” “corporate interests” and “the wealthy and powerful.”

That gloss overlooked the reality that people with little wealth or power frequently are forced to contend with overweening bureaucrats who invent their own authority and play by their own rules.

In the more consequential case, the court repudiated the Chevron doctrine, which required that judges defer to a federal agency’s “permissible” interpretation of an “ambiguous” statute.

The majority said that rule, which the court established in 1984, was unworkable (creating “an eternal fog of uncertainty” about what the law allows or requires) and fundamentally misguided (allowing the executive branch to usurp a judicial function).

Although People for the American Way perceived a win for “the corporate interests that have been itching to gut the power of federal agencies to protect our health and welfare,” the dispute at the center of the case complicates that picture.

Two family-owned fishing operations objected to onerous regulatory fees they said had never been authorized by Congress.

In a concurring opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch noted other examples of vulnerable supplicants who suffer when agencies are free to rewrite the laws under which they operate.

He cited cases involving a veteran seeking disability benefits and an immigrant fighting to remain in the country.

Because of an arbitrary rule that the Department of Veterans Affairs invented for its own convenience, Thomas Buffington lost three years of disability benefits that the government owed him.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: administrativestate; agencyregulations; chevron; governmentagencies; gvtregs; scotus

1 posted on 07/04/2024 7:43:48 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Try being a small company that has to compete with large corporations with extensive regulatory compliance departments.

Somehow the company I work for managed to do it and grow but it wasn’t easy.


2 posted on 07/04/2024 8:19:57 PM PDT by packagingguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Correct. Democrats and big business are in bed together. Dims are the party of the “elites” and wealthy. Only big business and extremely wealthy can afford to abide by oppressive regulations thereby driving out competition and creating loyal bedfellows.
It is disgusting fascism, crony-capitalism, whatever you want to call it. It’s leftist and it is wrong!


3 posted on 07/04/2024 9:06:44 PM PDT by vpintheak (Sometimes you’re the windshield, sometimes you’re the bug. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

Bingo


4 posted on 07/05/2024 6:02:40 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson