Posted on 07/01/2024 9:04:17 AM PDT by DallasBiff
Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas has questioned the legitimacy of Jack Smith's appointment as special counsel as the Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump is partially immune from prosecution for actions taken while he was in the White House.
In a 6-3 ruling, the justices returned Trump's case to the trial court to determine what is left of special counsel Jack Smith's indictment of Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...
Also poor Jack Smith, his dream is dead.
In reality, Jack Smith couldn’t carry Donald Trump‘s jockstrap!
Jack’s off...
the case.
The case is dead...
Jack’s reason for living is dead.
The courts need to throw Smith out.
I read Justice Thomas’s concurrence opinion as giving a ‘green light’ to Judge Cannon in Florida to rule that Jack Smith illegally occupies the Special Prosecutor job.
The ultimate “Magic Negro”?
BTW, what is this all about? The Newsweek article is not racist or have any content whatsoever criticizing Thomas. This was actually a very good pass-through of what Thomas wrote.
Makes me wonder if you read the article you posted.
Hit the road, Jack.
BTW, what is this all about?
*******************
Could it be that it’s a 100% true statement that’s not directly related to this article?
He'd probably sniff it though.
Gotta love the noose weak headline eh? “Clarence Thomas ‘goes after’ hack smith!”. Typical treatment for plantation escapees!
Thomas will never forget.
Looks like a character from Star Trek in that outfit
One of the bad guys
The several racist comments or claims in this thread are unfortunate at best. They are wrong. Both regarding the linked article and for being posted on FR. Surprising sometimes how little it takes to draw out racists on FR.
Yea but based on the Gaydar…he probably wants to.
Newsweak is clearly trying to reform itself. Unfortunately, with the product of journalism schools these days, there is an inherent staffing problem to that end, thus enabling the occasional MSM usual. We'll see if it continues to improve, but until then, our usual skepticism (as opposed to bias) is entirely in order.
Please point out the comments you believe are racist.
L
Jack Smith has the degenerate look of a weasely, Spanish court sycophant that has to take a huge dump.
You know, maybe you are right: I could not say exactly what it was, but something is just not right about him. Sure, he is wound too tight, as his picture shows, but it is more than that, and even more than being a rabid liberal prosecutor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.