Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert Election Model Gives Trump 2 in 3 Chance of Winning White House
Breitbart ^ | 06/26/2024 | Nick Gilbertson

Posted on 06/26/2024 2:37:51 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Fingers crossed 🤞
1 posted on 06/26/2024 2:37:51 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

One would need to examine the inner details of how he came up with his model. It is still early but I do hope he is right because we will need some cushion as I doubt his model takes into account dem fraud.


2 posted on 06/26/2024 2:43:07 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

There is a reason the Biden side of things is hoping for something big at the debate. They need something to change.


3 posted on 06/26/2024 2:44:40 PM PDT by goodolemr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

A Nate Silver prediction doesn’t exactly increase my confidence, but I guess we take what we get.


4 posted on 06/26/2024 2:46:10 PM PDT by cdcdawg (Pointing out hypocrisy is meaningless to the Left; they don't have principles, they have goals. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Silver and I came up with the same model many years ago. I used to run a "Political Junkie's Guide to the Election" where I would review the latest polls, run my probability using the latest polling data, and produce an electoral vote map.

I stopped doing it after 2016 when I became convinced that the polls were either juiced or that voter fraud was endemic and disqualified all the polls.

-PJ

5 posted on 06/26/2024 2:47:12 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I only trust Larry Sabato’s model.


6 posted on 06/26/2024 2:48:14 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

In a lawful election, where the 15th Amendment was followed and there were no drop boxes or mail-in ballots are people who throw out (R) ballots, probably.

But that isn’t the election we get to face. We get to face an election where they finely tune the (D) ballots to the ballot.


7 posted on 06/26/2024 2:48:37 PM PDT by Jonty30 (He hunted a mammoth for me, just because I said I was hungry. He is such a good friend. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Larry Sabato is a TDS punk.


8 posted on 06/26/2024 2:50:43 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

The only way Biden wins the election is to steal it. It needs to be said early and often. What doesn’t need to be said is what will happen to voters who are ineligible or vote twice. They’ll know.


9 posted on 06/26/2024 2:51:01 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

In a totally fair election - and with an honest news media - I’d give Trump a 100% chance of winning - because no one in their right mind would vote for this insanity if they were not being deceived.

However, since elections are far from fair and the people are totally deceived - it’s a crap shoot.


10 posted on 06/26/2024 3:02:38 PM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Another factor it seems to me is the lack of good samples. Most people I know screen calls so we won’t get polled. So only the less savvy people take the calls from the pollsters?

You have special expertise so maybe you can weigh in on whether it is even possible to truly get good data for political polls these days.


11 posted on 06/26/2024 3:08:54 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: enumerated

I agree completely. Everyone knows the Demx are going to cheat in every way possible.


12 posted on 06/26/2024 3:11:43 PM PDT by RWGinger (FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

I hope you aren’t serious. You don’t have a sarcasm tag.


13 posted on 06/26/2024 3:21:14 PM PDT by Eccl 10:2 (Prov 3:5 --- "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

We need healthy majorities in the House and Senate for real Constitutional change to government to be made and to get the Obama Swamp drained.


14 posted on 06/26/2024 3:23:31 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
41 percent voted against Reagan in 1984.
15 posted on 06/26/2024 3:24:07 PM PDT by cowboyusa (YESHUA IS KING AMERICA, AND HE WILL HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE HIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
That's what we have to live with, I'm afraid.

Part of it is quality of respondent. The pollsters try to compensate for this by oversampling by several orders of magnitude; they then filter out their responses in order to keep the responses that fit the target demographics so they can get a sample that is representative across naational statistics like age, race or ethnicity, gender, geography, education, earnings, party affiliation, etc.

It gets harder and harder as people stop answering their phones due to spam telemarketing, or people no longer have landlines and are now mobile (area codes no longer represent regions). To compensate for this they also solicit responses on-line (like YouGov) where they offer people discount coupons for completing their surveys. This approach can self-select for people who are on-line or people who are looking for discounts. These factors might have hidden biases (on-line might screen out the elderly, discount hunters might screen out the wealthy).

So the best thing one can do is just track the changes in the polls from week to week (which is what I used to do), as well as look at the cross-tabs for inconsistencies in the answers.

Silver and I did the math to figure out how to convert poll results and margins of error into probabilities of winning or losing. Silver had the backing and resources of the New York Times, I only had myself and publicly available poll data (I wouldn't pay for subscription fees).

I usually started about now to set a pre-convention baseline and then compare the changes as we headed towards the conventions and then the debates. I also did the House and the Senate in one combined report.

I might revive the Presidential race just to see what it looks like. We'll see...

-PJ

16 posted on 06/26/2024 3:25:22 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cowboyusa

Right.. but the stupidity of voting for Mondale is nothing compared to the insanity of voting for these crooks.


17 posted on 06/26/2024 3:30:24 PM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

I suspect his model has no parametric value for fraud and cheating.


18 posted on 06/26/2024 3:40:14 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Makes sense. Thanks for your insights.


19 posted on 06/26/2024 3:57:21 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

20 posted on 06/26/2024 3:58:47 PM PDT by caww (O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson