Skip to comments.
Holder worried Supreme Court will come to ‘dangerous’ conclusion on Trump immunity
The Hill ^
| 06/19/2024
| Tara Suter
Posted on 06/19/2024 4:39:55 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Former Attorney General Eric Holder said Wednesday he is concerned that the Supreme Court will come to a “dangerous” conclusion on former President Trump’s claim of presidential immunity, partly because it has taken time for the justices to reveal their decision.
Trump has made the immunity claim on charges related to the federal cases he faces on storing classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida and related to the 2020 election and the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: ericholder; holder; immunity; puppetmasterbarack; supremecourt; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 last
To: ChicagoConservative27
He should worry more, maybe even cry about it.
81
posted on
06/20/2024 7:43:01 AM PDT
by
cdcdawg
(Pointing out hypocrisy is meaningless to the Left; they don't have principles, they have goals. )
To: ChicagoConservative27
No he’s worried they’ll follow the constitution. 😆
82
posted on
06/20/2024 7:56:09 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: sauropod
83
posted on
06/20/2024 8:54:24 AM PDT
by
sauropod
("This is a time when people reveal themselves for who they are." James O'Keefe Ne supra crepidam)
To: Labyrinthos
I believe it was Roberts grilling the State when that was brought up. Both sides seemed to agree you can. Maybe a president is considered an officer forever?
84
posted on
06/20/2024 9:25:27 AM PDT
by
cdnerds
(Vapingunderground)
To: ChicagoConservative27
The precedent has been set by Steve Bannon to put you in prison for ignoring a Congressional subpoena, Erin.
And Trump’s prosecution that ignores statute of limitations means we can do the same to you.
85
posted on
06/20/2024 9:25:57 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Throwing that out there so that the appropriate people can threaten certain Supreme Court justices.
86
posted on
06/20/2024 10:10:07 AM PDT
by
CatOwner
(Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
To: plain talk
"I wouldn’t read too much into the timeframe" Sotomayor's tears work better for me.
87
posted on
06/20/2024 10:16:42 AM PDT
by
rx
To: ChicagoConservative27
ANYTHING the left doesn’t like is “dangerous”.
To: Ancesthntr
my bad...meant to say:
Republican prosecutor go after a “DEMOCRAT” politician
89
posted on
06/20/2024 12:51:22 PM PDT
by
Sir Bangaz Cracka
(Poor 'lil Travon bees slamming dat white cracka'a head into dat sidewalk causin he be scared)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson