Trump's J6 words weren't inflammatory.
Trump's base has for years been hardened upon the forge of unceasing, ever increasing outrages.
Biden's base rarely loses so they will rage at every outrage.
Posted on 06/19/2024 4:39:55 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Former Attorney General Eric Holder said Wednesday he is concerned that the Supreme Court will come to a “dangerous” conclusion on former President Trump’s claim of presidential immunity, partly because it has taken time for the justices to reveal their decision.
Trump has made the immunity claim on charges related to the federal cases he faces on storing classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida and related to the 2020 election and the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
From Led Zeppelin III…
Trump's J6 words weren't inflammatory.
Trump's base has for years been hardened upon the forge of unceasing, ever increasing outrages.
Biden's base rarely loses so they will rage at every outrage.
“Updated December 20, 2020”
https://news.yahoo.com/trump-promises-wild-protests-washington-165055313.html
The term “wild” as uttered by Trump was publicly known across the nation over two weeks before January 6th, 2021 according to leftist Business Insider & Yahoo.
“Several pro-Trump Republicans, however, have said they plan to disrupt the formal process, with Representative-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia tweeting on Saturday: “On January 6th...I will OBJECT and REJECT the fraudulent electoral votes from several states across the country.’
—Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) December 19, 2020”
“GO Wild Conference Washington DC 2023 for planners, makers and creators
“Our premium in-person conference is unlike any other. The speakers, the swag, & the spirit of GO Wild are hard to describe.”
https://www.wildforplanners.com/
I suspect nearly every one of them voted for Biden:
https://www.youtube.com/embed/wJrRYKfAC7U
EXACTLY
HE GOT AWAY WITH FAR TOO MUCH.
When is The Hill going to go out of business?
This guy Holder is an architect of alll this.
Trump made statements that the American people had to a right to hear. That is protected under Amendment I.
Trump’s use of “go wild” is the critical issue.
For younger folks it would meaning yelling, screaming, waving signs vigorously and other actions that are non-violent and non-destructive.
Conservative folks behave in a conservative manner.
If I was the planner, I would have had the crowd yell:
Georgia - stolen
Arizona - stolen
Wisconsin - stolen
Pennsylvania - stolen
Michigan - stolen
Investigate - the nation will wait.
Older folks like me don’t go wild.
I’d love to see that POC** Eric Holder come to his own dangerous conclusion at the end of a piano wire noose.
** that’s “Piece Of Crap”, not “Person Of Color”.
None of this is Eric the Holder’s business. He needs to go back into the men’s room and resume his job as a “holder”. Damn black rasist.
Got your faux democracy in a bunch, Holder?
Is there a specific status o limitations on Contempt of congress. Is it too late to throw Holder in prison?
“Posted on May 13, 2016”
“Barack Obama tweets the number 69, and Twitter users go wild”
https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/barack-obama-twitter-69-meme/
A “dangerous” conclusion.
Oh my God, they might actually follow the law and the constitution!
Holder…. Worst AG evah! Worst!
Article I, Section 3, Clause 7:
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
President Trump was impeached but not convicted of the charge of insurrection. If he had been convicted he could have faced criminal prosecution. But this clause specifies when a president can be liable criminally: when he has been convicted by the Senate (requiring a 2/3 vote).
Apart from a conviction by the Senate, the president should constitutionally enjoy immunity from prosecution. This is how the Supreme Court should decide.
The president is unique in comparison to other offices from which a person might be removed by impeachment: The president has the power to pardon. He could even pardon himself. Couldn’t any presidents simply issue themselves a blanket pardon for any possible crimes they might have wittingly or unwittingly committed while in office?
Unindicted co-conspirator, anti American, Racist, gun-running POS former Wing Man.
Only one fits that description.
When is the decision due to come down?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.