Posted on 06/06/2024 11:01:00 AM PDT by Red Badger
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said Thursday he was shocked by how quickly Hunter Biden’s various defenses in his gun trial have “collapsed.”
Biden’s trial began Monday and he is confronting three federal gun charges brought by Special Counsel David Weiss in September, which include providing false statements and knowingly possessing a gun while being addicted to drugs. Turley asserted on “America’s Newsroom” that the prosecution effectively countered Biden attorney Abbe Lowell’s argument that his client’s laptop, which is a key piece of evidence in the trial, is not fully authentic as well as the argument that Biden was not using drugs when he signed paperwork to purchase a gun.
VIDEO AT LINK...................
“The prosecution is doing an amazingly good job in my view,” Turley said. “This is a very disciplined case. What’s really astonishing is how fast all of the defenses put forward by Abbe Lowell collapsed within 48 hours. There was a long argument that the laptop was tampered with. They put on an agent saying there’s no tampering here. This is real and authentic. They said that Hunter Biden wasn’t doing drugs when he signed that. They have a text of him the next day trying to score drugs from a guy named Mookie, and a day after that, doing drugs on the hood of a car, according to a text.”
Corporate media, Big Tech, former intelligence officials and then-candidate Joe Biden cast doubt on the laptop’s authenticity in October of 2020, but now prosecutors are using it as important evidence during the trial.
“And all these other witnesses saying ‘of course he was an addict, he was doing crack every 20 minutes when I knew him.’ They then said well, ‘maybe someone else filled out the form.’ You had Mr. Cleveland say ‘I watched him fill out the form. I told him to take his time.’ So every one of these defenses collapsed shortly after they were stated by the defense. And that leads to this question of why, why isn’t he just pleading guilty? This is an open and shut case,” Turley added.
“It’s obvious he was doing drugs and that he had signed the form falsely,” he continued. “That might keep him out of jail. It certainly would have avoided an embarrassing trial. The answer is, this is Biden town. This is a Biden who is standing trial in his hometown and this is the opposite of Manhattan. Here the jury pool could not be better for the defendant. I think the defense is using a nullification strategy.”
Prosecutors obtained messages and material from Biden’s abandoned laptop, which is now considered real despite the previous assertions before the 2020 election, showing it to the jury as evidence of the defendant’s drug use around the period of purchasing the gun in 2018, according to CNN. Criminal defense attorney Bernarda Villalona suggested Biden plead guilty on Monday, asserting Weiss’ evidence against him is “strong” and that it may be his “best” course of action to evade incarceration.
Biden also faces nine federal tax charges, including tax evasion and tax fraud for tax years 2016 through 2019, according to the indictment against him. The president’s son’s attorneys appealed the case, but Judge Mark Scarsi denied it, with the trial slated to start on June 20.
The "rule of law" coyote versus the Democrat roadrunner.
Beep-beep!
Democrats understand that the "law" doesn't matter.
Only CONTROL of the "law" matters.
Meanwhile, "rule of law" Republicans and conservatives flail about helplessly, wondering what's going wrong.
NO....The drug infested jury will vote NOT GUILTY!!
He also had no CHECKING ACOOUNT??? What kind of BANK was he dealing with??
HAHAHAHHAHAH!!! One DEMOCRAT??? They are ALL DEMOCRATS!! Good grief!
“I’m actually hoping the jury acquits him.”
I think that’s the likely outcome.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From an election perspective, Bye-Done should be hoping that they convict young Hunter since it blunts any Trump argument about a two-tiered justice system. After that, he still has the option of pardoning (even though he said he wouldn’t) or coming up with some other scheme to let him skate free or at least nothing worse than a slap on the wrist with a wet noodle.
Seems like a good question.
Not precisely the same thing, but there is a cliche about lawyers — “Never ask a question to which you do not already know the answer.” Well, if a defense attorney bases their defense on something like “He didn’t personally fill out that form” and then gets refuted by someone who says “I saw him fill out that form”. And if that happens over and over then it sure seems like the defense is just throwing out crap and hoping something sticks. I would think that the legal infrastructure would stop that and say “We don’t engage in such amateur tactics here”.
Turley is a twit. A plant milking Fox for money.
He lied on the forms
Actually, Turley has been fairly accurate, it’s just that the actions of the Democratic players have been ridiculous.
What defense? He lied on the 4473, and that was easily proven.
CC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.