So there is highly unusual and extraordinary circumstances, but the author fails to include "unprecedented" where the DOJ did a search of a former president's residence and brought charges.
The DOJ used "unprecedented" and "extraordinary circumstances" in this witch hunt so the Judge can be expected to do "Highly Unusual" actions.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: where's_the_Outrage?
“This whole way she has conducted this case is wildly, totally, crazily unusual,” Toobin(AKA THE JERK OFF) told CNN’s AC360 on Wednesday.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Also..in related news, these same Newsweek “Experts” were not at all baffled by Merchans Jury instructions last week where he basically said they dont need to unanimously agree on a crime, to come to a unanimous guilty decision.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Baffled because they don’t know what to do about it.
4 posted on
06/06/2024 9:47:37 AM PDT by
ComputerGuy
(Heavily-medicated for your protection)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
toobin?
he who types with one hand
that toobin?
5 posted on
06/06/2024 9:48:48 AM PDT by
joshua c
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Well, Newsweak would find anything a judge does which slightly favors this defendant "baffling". Baffling is the "new normal" for these arrogant criminal betrayers of the public trust.
8 posted on
06/06/2024 9:51:58 AM PDT by
4Runner
To: where's_the_Outrage?
To: where's_the_Outrage?
A prosecutor on a federal criminal case was illegally appointed and has no legal authority to represent the US government in the case. The Judge is holding a hearing to consider the issue. And somehow that’s strange?
To: where's_the_Outrage?
More propaganda from a propaganda news source.
11 posted on
06/06/2024 9:54:13 AM PDT by
Revel
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Was he Toobin’ when he said that?
12 posted on
06/06/2024 9:55:21 AM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
lol these same experts Im had no issue with what just went on in NYC.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Did Toobin pull his penis out while he was making an ignorant ass of himself on CNN?
15 posted on
06/06/2024 9:56:19 AM PDT by
Bullish
(...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I was admitted to the bar over 30 years ago. I find nothing unusual in these matters
17 posted on
06/06/2024 9:57:19 AM PDT by
j.havenfarm
(23 years on Free Republic, 12/10/23! More than 8,000 replies and still not shutting up!)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Anyone who wants to check liberal abuses gets demonized by the corrupt media.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The right to question Tubin should be asking is why the special prosecutor should be trying to force the court to move forward at a pace that prevents Trump from having a fair chance at discovery, pretrial motions, etc. One might conclude that the trial is a matter of politics, not justice.
20 posted on
06/06/2024 9:59:05 AM PDT by
I-ambush
(From the brightest star comes the blackest hole. You had so much to offer, why didya offer your sou?)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Translation: “Didn’t Judge Cannon get the memo?!? We’ve already decided Trump is guilty, her job was just to grease the wheels for that to happen like the Judge in New York. Yet she actually thinks Trump deserves a FAIR trial?!? Insanity!”
21 posted on
06/06/2024 9:59:27 AM PDT by
apillar
To: where's_the_Outrage?
We are hearing from some of the stupidest legal analysts alive. The seem never to have heard of due process or of amicus counsel.
22 posted on
06/06/2024 10:06:36 AM PDT by
jimfree
(My 21 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than Joe Biden.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
ALSO UNPRECEDENTED:
A “SPECIAL COUNSEL WHO WAS NEVER PROPERLY APPOINTED/ CONFIRMED, etc.
24 posted on
06/06/2024 10:11:57 AM PDT by
ridesthemiles
(not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Jack was required to be confirmed as prosecutor by the US Congress.
Jack was not confirmed as prosecutor by the US Congress.
Case closed.
27 posted on
06/06/2024 10:15:24 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
How can Judge Cannon, sitting in judgment of the person who appointed her, NOT be a conflict of interest?
That’s the biggest conflict of interest I’ve ever heard of!
To: where's_the_Outrage?
"This whole way democrats have conducted their cases against Trump is wildly, totally, crazily unusual,"
Correction was demanded by the truth.
29 posted on
06/06/2024 10:26:58 AM PDT by
adorno
(CCH)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson