Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Legal Experts: The Trump Trial Jury Instructions Are Not Normal
Townhall ^ | 05/29/2024 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 05/29/2024 9:38:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Closing arguments in the trial of former President Donald Trump in New York City, where he is charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, have concluded and Judge Juan Merchan has given the jury their instructions. The instructions were given verbally and jurors won't receive printed copies, although they can ask questions.

According to legal experts, Merchan's standards for a conviction are abnormal and do not require jurors to reach a unanimous decision on the charges. Further, jurors don't have to determine what crime was committed.

"Judge Merchan has ruled that the jury does not have to agree on what that crime is. The jury could split into three groups of four on which of the three crimes were being concealed and Merchan will still treat it as a unanimous verdict," George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley, who has been inside the courtroom, writes. "The jury has been given little substantive information on these crimes, and Merchan has denied a legal expert who could have shown that there was no federal election violation. This case should have been dismissed for lack of evidence or a cognizable crime."

...So four can find a state election violation, four can find a federal election violations and four can find tax violations and it will still be treated as a unanimous verdict.— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) May 28, 2024

The notion that Merchan's jury instructions could somehow fail to specifically instruct jurors about the second substantive "in furtherance of" crime—and its underlying statute, including the requisite mens rea/intent, etc.—is absolutely batshit insane.— Josh Hammer (@josh_hammer) May 28, 2024

Otherwise the instructions have been "standard."



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: hushmoney; judgemerchan; jury; merchan; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 05/29/2024 9:38:52 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Does “not normal” also mean illegal?


2 posted on 05/29/2024 9:40:05 AM PDT by Jonny7797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We don’t even have to agree what the crime is, we just have to find him guilty of something, anything! Because TRUMP!


3 posted on 05/29/2024 9:40:43 AM PDT by JoSixChip (2020: The year of unreported truths; 2021: My main take away from this year? Trust no one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Is it normal for the Judge’s daughter to raise $100 Million off Daddy’s trial?

.


4 posted on 05/29/2024 9:43:19 AM PDT by OakOak (Misinformation Campaign on your TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So basically, the Penis in a Black Robe told the doofuses that they could find Trump guilty if they don’t like him. America sucks with all these refugees azhos running around running our so called government.


5 posted on 05/29/2024 9:45:00 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (When did WE decide to make America a UN 5-Star Asylum Paradise for Socialist losers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is how the Democrats operate with elections also - The law doesn’t apply equally. This is why Democrats love when more laws are passed. They always get to pick and choose how they are executed.


6 posted on 05/29/2024 9:51:57 AM PDT by ProudDeplorable (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. ~ Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Lavrentiy Beria, the most ruthless and longest-serving secret police chief in Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror in Russia and Eastern Europe, bragged that he could prove criminal conduct on anyone, even the innocent. “Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” was Beria’s infamous boast. He served as deputy premier from 1941 until Stalin’s death in 1953, supervising the expansion of the gulags and other secret detention facilities for political prisoners. He became part of a post-Stalin, short-lived ruling troika until he was executed for treason after Nikita Khrushchev’s coup d’etat in 1953. Beria targeted “the man” first, then proceeded to find or fabricate a crime. Beria’s modus operandi was to presume the man guilty, and fill in the blanks later. By contrast, under the United States Constitution, there’s a presumption of innocence that emanates from the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments, as set forth in Coffin vs. U.S. (1895)...”...(added note: except under the Biden regime)

oxfordeagle site extract


7 posted on 05/29/2024 9:53:21 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (“Politicians are not born. They're excreted.” Marcus Tillius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Welcome to Mexico, Kiddies

The Spanish Catholic Inquisitioner says “off with his head!”

This is why we fought a Revolution....to get rid of trash like “Merchan”


8 posted on 05/29/2024 9:54:26 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Kangaroo court on full display with clowns and cymbal monkeys.


9 posted on 05/29/2024 9:56:32 AM PDT by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just heard that the jury instructions are 55 pages long!!!

No wonder the judge didn’t give them to the jury.


10 posted on 05/29/2024 10:07:01 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Build the Wall, Deport Them All. No amnesty for anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonny7797

Will it soon be a “new normal” or is it already?


11 posted on 05/29/2024 10:07:33 AM PDT by equaviator (If 60 is the new 40, then 35 must be the new 15.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jonny7797

It means.. mentally ill. A “judge” who is a TOOL of the Gangs of New York the New Tammany Hall/Cartel owned tools.

They cannot own us. They will not.


12 posted on 05/29/2024 10:12:25 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, the jury can send Trump to jail because the jurors agree he must be guilty of something? This is a new standard of justice, right?


13 posted on 05/29/2024 10:22:53 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

a new standard of justice is back to the old world standard

guilty till proven innocent


14 posted on 05/29/2024 10:27:30 AM PDT by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jonny7797

Jury also not allowed to bring the instructions with them to deliberate.

Highly unusual according to this guy:

https://x.com/AGAndrewBailey/status/1795840914486948097


15 posted on 05/29/2024 10:30:14 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Nothing about this trial is normal. 🙄


16 posted on 05/29/2024 10:36:19 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Can his attorneys make an appeal right now based on instructions? If they violate 4th amendment, this could be stopped right now.


17 posted on 05/29/2024 10:37:43 AM PDT by BigEdLB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

File this under No Shit


18 posted on 05/29/2024 10:39:12 AM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

He has to give them some instructions written down. I have sat on nearly 15 trials and you usually get a one page document with the possible guilty on X,Y,Z charges. In KY on the felony cases we had to be unanimous and that meant 12-0, not this 4-4-4 idiocy.

They will elect a foreman and then probably read the possible guilty options, kick it around and get a feel for the opinions in the room and possibly take a vote thereafter if everyone seems in agreement which is rare and proceed accordingly. I sat on one trial where the quick vote was all we needed and it was a civil trial where you don’t need a unanimous verdict and it was 12-1.

This is the biggest joke of a criminal trial I have ever witnessed. I live in the middle of the mountains and trial are taken seriously here. With this kangaroo court in NY I have never seen a judge or courtroom so bereft of due process and basic courtroom decorum and behavior.


19 posted on 05/29/2024 10:45:05 AM PDT by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

no chyt cherlock !
LEX


20 posted on 05/29/2024 10:45:55 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson