[monkeyshine]

It still leaves the possibility that one or more juror thinks no crime was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

[ClearCase_guy]

I believe that 2 people on the jury are lawyers.

In my opinion, if those 2 lawyers see this as “beyond a reasonable doubt”, they ought to be disbarred.

[plain talk]

"It still leaves the possibility that one or more juror thinks no crime was proven beyond a reasonable doubt."

Yes. In a normal world a reasonable jury would unanimously conclude that no crime has been committed. In a New York world trial like this perhaps a few reasonable and strong jurors will emerge.

It has become "show me the man and I'll find you the crime(s)".

[OakOak]

Merchan also allowed Jurors that said they hated Trump onto the Jury.

He was going to get Trump, make no mistake.

[chickenlips]

It still leaves the possibility that one or more juror thinks no crime was proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
**************************************************************
CORRECTION:
It still leaves the possibility that one or more juror thinks no crime was proven beyond a reasonable doubt and is willing allow themselves and/or their family to be assaulted, their livelihood threatened and their property destroyed.

[Reynoldo]

That’s what I’ve been thinking all along….hung jury.