Hmmm. I followed the trial and am still waiting to hear what the crime is and what the evidence is.
it’s all on the books....the crime would be if it wasn’t on the books. Any anyone with an ounce of brain know this was Cohen’s scheme to deceive Trump.
The crime is he beat Hillary Clinton like an old rug.....................
The evidence is overwhelming. The problem is, the evidence does not meet the burden of proof that a crime was committed. So the prosecution, with the apparent assistance of the judge, is attempting to convince the jury that they can convict based on the logical inferences that can be drawn from the evidence.
“...still waiting to hear what the crime is and what the evidence is.”
One wonders if that is by design, with a loaded judge that ignores Constitutional laws it is much easier to convict with that ambiguity with a hand-picked biased jury. Appeal to above courts will take years and the crooked prosecution knows this. Who knows, SCOTUS may step in just like they did in Florida when the rats were still counting weeks later and end this mess.
“Focus on the evidence and the logical inferences that can be drawn from that evidence,”
Is that now the standard for “Beyond a Reasonable doubt”?
If Trump found guilty, time to lock and load.