the map in question.
The finished product:
Posted on 05/23/2024 5:11:15 AM PDT by hardspunned
A map of Russian territory has been trotted out by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul as a prop in Congress, as seen from footage published by C-SPAN.
McCaul was fervently advocating dropping US restrictions for Ukraine to hit targets inside Russia. McCaul rattled off a list of weapons funneled to the Kiev regime, including long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and HIMARS, claiming that restrictions on their use meant that Ukrainians had “they hands tied behind their backs.”
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
If the zeepers/neocons don’t believe this will dramatically raise the risk of tactical nuclear weapons use by Moscow, I have a bridge to sell.
Discount it for a quick sale before its turned to rubble.
If the Russians do not want to be attacked within Russia then they should stop attacking Ukraine. You reap what you sow. (And no, this will not start WWIII.)
McCaul’s map was from Victoria Nuland’s ISW - Institute for the Study of War.
Zeeper types will be hunted and gutted like deer when we get nuked.
Those red pins inside Russia validates what the Russians have been proclaiming all along. That they needed to have Ukraine and Belarus as buffer states between them and NATO armed Europe.
This argument was put out prior to Finland and the Baltic states becoming part of NATO. Russia is now practically surround by NATO forces.
The globohomo’s are insisting on starting WW3. They WANT to achieve their twin goals of wiping out Russia and wiping out 95% of the earths population.
The ones that need to be wiped out are the Deep State globohomo’s. /spit
You neo-libs really aren't very bright.
Nobody can predict how the Russians would respond if they are attacked in Russia with US & Nato supplied weapons. The Russian government & military leadership are fully invested in the Ukraine war, but perhaps the majority of the Russian population are not. An attack inside Russian with US & Nato supplied Russia would solidify support for Putin from the Russian populace, as 9/11 unified Americans for a while. I don’t think Russia would nuke the US, or any Nato country, but I wouldn’t put it past them to use a tactical nuke in the Ukraine to up the ante.
“An attack inside Russian territory with US/Nato supplied weapons would solidify support for Putin within the Russian populace”
Just give the UKR and other bordering nations tactical nukes then we don’t have to worry about what Russia does -we’ll know.
They’re leave UKR and remain inside Russia’s borders lest what they’ve done to their neighbors is done back to them.
That even gets us further towards WW3. It is the Cuban missile crises all over again with the US and Russia in reverse positions.
“An attack inside Russian territory with US/Nato supplied weapons would solidify support for Putin within the Russian populace”
—
An all the FAB-250s dropped on Russians by Russians did what for Putin’s support?
HAHAHAHA
Fear monger
Mother Russia will not use tactical nukes. She wants to continue to live, even in abject poverty
The Russians love their children too.
Like I said, I don’t think the majority of the Russian populace support “Putins War”, and Russian bombs on Russian villages turns more Russions against Putin. Attacks inside Russia by Ukraine with US missiles/bombs would have the opposite effect in my opinion.
Well, the Cuban Missile Crisis went along way to creating the detente which lasted for 40 years.
Yeah but it was a dangerous time, we were very close to WW3. The clown show running our country today is a far cry from JFK. Brinkmanship with Biden and his team, yeah that’s the ticket....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.