Posted on 05/21/2024 6:44:57 AM PDT by mabarker1
In the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, many Americans have been left scrambling to understand the widespread doubt that has been cast over the U.S. election systems.
More Americans than ever now doubt the integrity of American elections, and most U.S. voters believe that cheating is likely to affect the 2024 presidential election results.
The potential implications that have arisen after the 2020 election and the mass chaos that kicked off in the wake of drawn-out vote-counting and murky mail-in ballot drop boxes have drawn the ire of many proponents of election integrity, including President Donald Trump.
He has long stated that the 2020 presidential election was “rigged and stolen,” and since leaving office, there have been numerous controversies surrounding the counting and receiving protocols for mail-in ballots.
On Saturday, while speaking at the NRA Annual Meeting in Dallas, Texas, Trump suggested that a potential reelection win for his campaign in November 2024 could represent a “third term.”
He told the audience, “You know, FDR [had] 16 years — almost 16 years — he was four terms. I don’t know, are we going to be considered three-term? Or two-term?”
This comment might suggest that if he were the rightful winner of the presidential election in 2020, he would technically be the President of the United States right now, marking a technical third term upon a November win, following this line of logic.
President Trump has called Joe Biden a “Manchurian candidate” who is “owned by China.” He has also described Biden as “corrupt” and “compromised.”
A Manchurian candidate is anyone who is manipulated or controlled by an enemy power to harm their own country. President Trump’s theory here on Biden, coupled with his own comments about a potential “third term” presidency, seems to illustrate that the 45th president strongly believes that Joe Biden is simply not the rightful Commander in Chief.
Regardless of what FReepers or anybody else wanted, the January 20th 2021 was an invalid inauguration based on overwhelming evidence of fraudulent and invalid election results.
Trump was never sworn into office following the 2020 election results so 2024 cannot technically be Trump’s third term.
However the January 20th 2021 swearing in of Joe Biden was an invalid inauguration based on overwhelming evidence of fraudulent and invalid election results.
Technically we have been without a President for the last four years.
And it shows.
Who appoints the Electors, that choose the President?
Did ANY State Legislature, but ESPECIALLY the Legislatures of Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania or Georgia convene, debate, and than act officially to dispute the appointment of their Electors?
NO THEY DID NOT.
People voting in November is not how Presidents are chosen, at least not according to the Constitution.
I’m not saying it’s not legit. People think it has always been
I’m saying it is clung to as a truth and a tenet more than most. More than free speech. More than the war powers act
More than the 4th amendment More than realizing we actually don’t practice slavery
More than biological facts
More than our need to examine and truly visit term limits for congress
Yep.
I think their goal has long been to shake confidence in our elections, and the Electoral College.
It does not matter if the democRATS change their story regarding the outcome of 2020, OBiden was sworn in as POTUS, not DJT.
DJT starts his second term next January ... provided that much of the mail-in voting, drop boxes, week-long vote counting, etc are curtailed.
Misses the point. Many, many people have been removed from office because of corrupt voting. Getting sworn in has little to do with anything.
What would be exciting is a claim that since BeijingBiden is an illegitimate occupier of the WHouse, does that mean EVERYTHING he did does not count? All ExceOrders are invalid — and everything that happened in response to them must be voided. Every law he signed is invalid. Ooh. A complete do-over.
Let’s do that. The world gets to watch the world power say that we made a terrible mistake and are fixing it. No sweeping it under the rug, but fixing it.
The irony of that.
They’re stuck because if they admit that, they admit they cheated as everyone suspects and that the last four years was an illegitimate overthrow of the country, an insurrection, if you will.
Which then raises a question.
If that’s the case, then does that invalidate everything the biden/obama shadow government did? Can the keystone pipeline be reopened and the wall built and all the illegals deported, to start with?
Of course not, though it would be the third time for him to be elected president.
Probably so. They think we'll never resort to the third box.
We called it.
They will decide Trump WAS cheated of his second term.
Then they will deny him “a third term”.
Ping to nully. Conspiracy Theories are merely Spoiler Alerts, these days.
You don't understand the left. They will say, "Of course we didn't steal 2020 when it comes to denying Trump the 2020-2024 term. Yet, of course we DID steal 2020 when it comes to denying Trump a 2024-2028 term."
You think they care about that?
Only if the MSN-DNC-DOJ can make it happen.
Cheating in the November preference poll is irrelevant.
Electors are not appointed by voters. They are appointed by State Legislatures.
How they do that is entirely up to them.
In the present case, the State Legislatures of Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia DID NOT CHALLENGE the appointments of Biden electors. NOT ONE TIME. They did not even convene, not one time, to act on the matter.
The only election in the Constitution took place on December 14, 2020, there were 538 voters, and 306 of them voted for Biden.
He won, he's the President, Constitutionally, legally, any other way you want to slice it.
It would not matter if Trump had 100 million votes and Biden had zero in November (matter legally, I mean).
As long as the State Legislatures appointed or did not contest the appointment of 306 Biden electors (and they did not), there's no case that Biden is not the legal President.
Well done.
It seems to me that given the pervasive evidence of fraud, that the issue should go or have gone to the Supreme Court. The State Legislatures are either in on the fraud or politically chicken as is probably the Supreme Court.
Obama continues to take America into the Brave New World of unabashed lies and deception.
The Supreme Court has no authority over the process. They were reckless and foolish to hear, much less to decide, Bush v. Gore, since by so doing they centralized power even more than it had already been by 2000.
No.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.