To: Jim W N
The appointment of Electors is one of the plenary powers granted in the Constitution, and is one of the reasons our States are still referred to as "sovereign".
The Supreme Court has no authority over the process. They were reckless and foolish to hear, much less to decide, Bush v. Gore, since by so doing they centralized power even more than it had already been by 2000.
39 posted on
05/21/2024 10:40:14 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
To: Jim Noble
Given the extensive evidence of fraud and cheating leading directly to a wrong result, I don't think it's reckless and foolish to have the Supreme Court look at it. This is nothing like the "hanging chads" fine lines of Bush v. Gore nor do I think doing so threatens state sovereignty. The extensive evidence of cheating is not state-specific, but global and requires something like the Supreme Court to examine it.
51 posted on
05/21/2024 1:33:14 PM PDT by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson