[Jim Noble]

The appointment of Electors is one of the plenary powers granted in the Constitution, and is one of the reasons our States are still referred to as "sovereign".

The Supreme Court has no authority over the process. They were reckless and foolish to hear, much less to decide, Bush v. Gore, since by so doing they centralized power even more than it had already been by 2000.

[Jim W N]

Given the extensive evidence of fraud and cheating leading directly to a wrong result, I don't think it's reckless and foolish to have the Supreme Court look at it. This is nothing like the "hanging chads" fine lines of Bush v. Gore nor do I think doing so threatens state sovereignty. The extensive evidence of cheating is not state-specific, but global and requires something like the Supreme Court to examine it.