Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shock study shows how 42M recipients spend their food stamps - and they're not buying broccoli
Daily Mail ^ | May 20, 2024 | James Reinl

Posted on 05/20/2024 12:12:27 PM PDT by chickenlips

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last
To: Reynoldo

And we all know it’ll never happen. Ever. Or at least until there is complete societal collapse and our new overlords mandate we speak Mandarin.


61 posted on 05/20/2024 1:10:06 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“When exposing a crime is treated like a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Edward Snowden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Most of the people on SNAP are morbidly obese.


62 posted on 05/20/2024 1:11:24 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

How long can a poor disabled senior live on that diet, and how many times do you think kids would eat it, or anyone.

Along with those who should not be getting aid or who should receive it for a very short time are some food stamp recipients who are feeding kids and some past working capabilities who are on them permanently.


63 posted on 05/20/2024 1:12:45 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips
Of course, this comes from a foreign source as none of our domestic news outlets print anything but praise for the thieving 'Rats and the morons/traitors that vote for them.

What is published is how SNAP benefit requiremnts are being loosened so as to create more welfare whores.

64 posted on 05/20/2024 1:13:06 PM PDT by mcenedo (lying liberal media, our most dangerous and powerful enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

Anybody who is surprised by this obviously has never been behind a welfare recipient at the check out line at Walmart.


65 posted on 05/20/2024 1:13:18 PM PDT by Bernard (“God's cruelest punishment is to let you reap what you sow.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

According to Deep State’s new definition, the morbidly obese suffer from food insecurity, too.

I kid you not.

Check it out.


66 posted on 05/20/2024 1:14:28 PM PDT by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

I noticed two things related to this over the weekend: 1) the man who offered to pay with his EBT if I bought something at the convenience store in exchange for cash, and 2) the candy store now accepts EBT.


67 posted on 05/20/2024 1:14:54 PM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

Lowering the cost of the $135 BILLION per year program by $27 billion over TEN years is going to “gut” it? That’s only $2.7 billion less per year.


68 posted on 05/20/2024 1:15:16 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wayne07

A lot of people who live in various big cities are afraid of tap water - some with good reason.


69 posted on 05/20/2024 1:15:27 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

I’m not going to read about the “cut” (who reads the original article, if you can even find it, on FR?) but I would guess that this is a “budget cut” which means actual spending will still go up year over year just not as much as requested. Said request for as probably pump up in anticipation of a “cut” so this is nothing.

Wake me up when actual spending is cut.


70 posted on 05/20/2024 1:16:00 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Those cruel Republicans want to gut the program by 2%. Terrible!


71 posted on 05/20/2024 1:17:08 PM PDT by CitizenUSA (Proverbs 14:34 Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Saintgermain

“”””Really what else did anyone expect as most of the recipients are not the sharpest knife in the drawer.””””

I don’t know the percentage but a lot are going to be impulsive, uneducated, lower IQ, and to live lives of instant gratification.

When I sold encyclopedias door to door the secret to my high sales was that I chose to hit working/poor class black neighborhoods unlike every employee I hired who wanted to go to the rich neighborhoods.


72 posted on 05/20/2024 1:18:48 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Restless

That is true even in this rural area. Most of us are fit and not overweight. But drive 20 miles to the only real town-less than 900 people-with a small chain grocery store and you might see a really obese woman or two in the aisles/at the checkout with a cart full of deli and bakery stuff, packaged, frozen food, cases of soda, candy, jelly, Nutella, boxes of mac and cheese, instant potatoes, 6-8 loaves of white bread, etc, etc-and she swipes a LoneStar EBT card to pay for it all, as the non-overweight folks in the line give her looks that should knock her to the floor...


73 posted on 05/20/2024 1:18:53 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET
In Illinois, food is taxed at 1% and other products are taxed at 6.25%. So if the registers can tell the difference, it would be easy enough to tag SNAP-eligible food items and not allow the card to be used on other items.

Of course, that might create some issues at the of the check-out, when the consumer refuses to reduce the purchase because SNAP is maxed out or they can't cover the non-SNAP product.

74 posted on 05/20/2024 1:21:33 PM PDT by Bernard (“God's cruelest punishment is to let you reap what you sow.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: markman46

I GET ZERO FOOD STAMPS


75 posted on 05/20/2024 1:23:17 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Restless
Anyone who has stood behind a food stamper in the checkout line is fully aware of the garbage food that is purchased.

My folks owned a grocery store when I was growing up. We stopped accepting food stamps for this and similar reasons. It has always been a scam.

76 posted on 05/20/2024 1:24:24 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
There should be a list of things you can’t buy with food stamps.

No. there should be a much shorter list of things you can buy. Anything with carbonation in it would definitely not be in the list.

77 posted on 05/20/2024 1:26:29 PM PDT by zeugma (Stop deluding yourself that America is still a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

I’ve seen some buy nothing but what they can easily sell (e.g. entire cart fulls of Coke only).


78 posted on 05/20/2024 1:30:19 PM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronniesgal
I don’t care if they don’t eat healthy! that’s their problem not mine.

It's yours when their medical bills come due.

79 posted on 05/20/2024 1:32:55 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

Do away with SNAP and use money from the farm bill to pay small AMERICAN farmers for a little bit of extra rice, beans, sugar, flour, spam and powdered milk.

Give poor people a voucher for a certain amount of these items each week to be picked up from a government facility. The items would be wrapped in a bright orange and green wrapper to let everyone know that the people eating it are freeloaders.

Nobody starves but nobody gets as much free poison as they want.

This would save us billions, help the poor be healthy and make them put in a little bit of effort for their calories.

Big Ag and major food conglomerates would never allow this though. The people who rule over us hate us.


80 posted on 05/20/2024 1:35:03 PM PDT by nitzy (I wonder if the telescreens in 1984 were first called "free Obamascreens")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson