For me, this is just operation chaos. I don’t think FDIC is much different from any large organization. Some people either don’t know boundaries, or they don’t understand them.
Consistently good behavior is actually quite rare among people — especially when they think they’re not being observed.
Not any earth-shattering story, in my view; but I say, “Let ‘er rip” if it causes the cadaver’s regime any grief.
“’Certain employees from underrepresented groups reported on how demoralizing it was to be told by colleagues that they were ‘only hired’ because they were a member of an underrepresentd group and were ‘token’ employees hired to fill a quota,’” the firm writes.”
Isn’t that the law of the land now?
It’s not isolated to the FDIC. Inspect any agency and find the same thing.
“Women in one field office recounted how, to their dismay, it became routine to hear their supervisor talk about their breasts and legs and his sex life,” the report stated.
“A woman examiner reported on the shock of receiving a picture of an FDIC senior examiner’s private parts out of the blue while serving on detail in a field office, only to be told later by others in that field office that she should stay away from him because he had a ‘reputation,’” the firm reported.
Most of the rest of it sounds like the fruit of any invitation to whine anonymously. Email every employee a memo that says: “Don’t say or do the sort of crap listed below” and move on.
Don't they understand that we have one justice system for the ruling class and one for the peasants?
First of all, babies and spouses don't come from Amazon.com (at least not yet).
People have been meeting at work and dating and etc., ever since Fred met Betty at the gravel pit in the Flintstones.
If some guy acts up at work he needs to be pasted in the face by the offended male/female/tranny.
Funny how, if some court takes this FDIC thing and runs with it, the guilty individuals NEVER pay the fine. It is the Government (i.e., We The People) who have to shell out for this. If it is a private company, then the shareholders do.
But, educators get to talk about their sex life to students, so what's the issue?