Posted on 05/03/2024 11:23:25 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
'I am not ruling anything out,' Emmanuel Macron insisted in an interview published today, pressed on whether France would send troops to Ukraine in its hour of need.
The remarks echo a new tone on Moscow in recent months, the French President reiterating pledges roundly rebuffed by his allies in the US, UK and Germany.
Europe and the United States have now committed more than £130bn to Ukraine in aid but NATO members have stopped short of promising boots on the ground - with Putin still willing to exploit the threat of nuclear Armageddon when prompted.
While Macron has argued his comments have been 'weighted, thought through and measured', they stand in stark contrast to the pre-war perception of the French President as 'appeasing' Russia over Ukraine.
Today, the French leader faces criticism from all sides - polling low at home and agitating allies in Europe over Ukraine. But with the absence of a rival war leader in Western Europe, Macron has found not only a distraction from domestic issues but a new role in facing down a historic foe.
As his rhetoric on the war evolves, experts suggest Macron's poker face could be using 'strategic ambiguity' to unsettle Moscow. But France's allies will be left hoping Putin does not call his bluff.
The French President had a sombre warning for Europeans last week, telling guests at the esteemed Sorbonne University in Paris: 'Our Europe, today, is mortal and it can die. It can die and this depends only on our choices.'
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
“”””Nato is not a suicide pact where Estonia can attack someone and everyone else has to join in.””””
Exactly, it is a defensive alliance.
See how it works out.
—
Would work out just dandy because the first thing the French would do is conduct SEAD deep into Russia, creating real air superiority - it would be all downhill for Russia after that.
No more glide bombs, no more bomber launched cruise missiles.
You speak as if you know what you are talking about.
And you don’t.
he thinks he can lead his country to a victory by invading Russia?
maybe he should take a quick high school level brush-up class in the history of Europe
ha!
yes, exactly what I was thinking
good one!
thanks
This is a reality many don’t seem to grasp.
Why are the Branch Covidians some of the biggest cheerleaders for Xiden and WW3?
If Dictator Xiden does initiate WW3, I won’t support him.
LOL!
LOL. Talk’s cheap. What is Macron going to do about it? His approval rating is in the toilet now, in the 20s. One can only imagine the domestic reaction to French soldiers coming home in body bags.
Nope. If a member state STARTS starts or gets involved in a war, the rest of NATO is not obligated.
Furthermore, Article 5 is wildly misconstrued as obligating others to go to war.
It only obligates them as follows.
” Article 5 provides that if a NATO Ally is the victim of an armed attack, each and every other member of the Alliance will consider this act of violence as an armed attack against all members and ***will take the actions it deems necessary*** to assist the Ally attacked.
That can be sanctions, a strongly worded letter, etc.
Oh not at all. NATO itself is expansionist, violent, and has attacked Libya and Serbia so far.
But if some NATO nation goes to attack someone, NATO members can stay out of it.
LOL, which countries did they conquer and make a member?
‘Our Europe, today, is mortal and it can die. It can die and this depends only on our choices.’
***************************************************************
Yes it can die AND IS DYING. It’s dying from infection by an unchecked invasion of malignant foreign organisms. And RUSSIA has had nothing to do with that… Europe’s own ‘leaders’ have invited that infection.
“ No more glide bombs, no more bomber launched cruise missiles.”
***************************************
Oh you FREEPERS must be drunken from your celebration of your latest success plundering the American people. When can we expect further endless lamentations that that additional $61 billion was inadequate?
If the Deep State of any of 32 countries manages to engineer a “Gulf of Tonkin” style incident, the terms of the NATO treaty apply.
The problem is when the Deep States and NeoCons of all the other countries are already looking for an excuse to join the war.
Disband NATO now !
NATO War, Biden Still 8%, CV19 Vax Crazy
by Greg Hunter
at USA Watchdog.com
Another step closer to nuclear war with Russia was put forth this week when it was announced that Ukraine would be joining NATO as early as July. Article 5 in NATO basically says all for one and one for all. So, when Russia attacks Ukraine after they join NATO, will all NATO countries go to war with Russia? In 1991, NATO promised that Ukraine would never join the alliance. This is broken promise on the road to perdition.
https://usawatchdog.com/nato-war-biden-still-8-cv19-vax-crazy/
“When can we expect further endless lamentations that that additional $61 billion was inadequate?”
That’s the one that called the $61B “pocket change”.
CrimsonTidegirl wrote: “Why are the Branch Covidians some of the biggest cheerleaders for Xiden and WW3? If Dictator Xiden does initiate WW3, I won’t support him.”
So why do you support Putin who is the biggest threat to world peace?
Your dictator biden is the biggest threat to world piece.
I don’t support Putin, nor Zelensky.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.