Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surprise! The IRS Lied About Who Those 80,000 New Agents Would Target
PJ Media ^ | 04/06/2024 | Rick Moran

Posted on 04/06/2024 7:02:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

"Never trust a man who lays his hand on his heart when he assures you of anything," goes the old axiom. That's why I never trust a Democrat who makes any promise ever about a federal agency or program.

Take Medicare. In 1966 when Medicare began, it cost $3 billion. The House Ways and Means Committee estimated that Medicare would cost about $12 billion by 1990. Instead, it cost $107 billion and today costs the government close to a trillion dollars.

So when Joe Biden and the Democrats assured Americans and Republicans in Congress that the $80 billion the president wanted to augment the IRS tax-collecting ability was only going to target "the rich," everyone with two brain cells working knew it was a lie.

It will surprise no one that an audit by the Treasury Inspector General For Tax Administration found that "President Biden's plan to hire a new army of tax collectors is falling flat, and the agents already at work are targeting the middle class."  

"As of last summer, 63% of new audits targeted taxpayers with income of less than $200,000," reports the Wall Street Journal. "Only a small overall share reached the very highest earners, while 80% of audits covered filers earning less than $1 million."

Bank robber Willie Sutton supposedly responded to the question of why he robs banks by saying with a shrug, "That's where the money is." So, too, the IRS audits well-off but not "rich" taxpayers because they can't afford the army of tax attorneys that the super-rich can bring to the table.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: audit; biden; bidenregime; harassment; irs; irsagents; persecution; targetting; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
Here's a gentle reminder of the assurances given to us by the Biden administration and Democrats in Congress.

"These resources are absolutely not about increasing audit scrutiny on small businesses or middle-income Americans. As we've been planning, our investment of these enforcement resources is designed around the Department of the Treasury's directive that audit rates will not rise relative to recent years for households making under $400,000," wrote IRS commissioner Charles Rettig in an August 2022 letter to concerned senators.

Janet Yellen was even more adamant. "Contrary to the misinformation from opponents of this legislation, small business or households earning $400,000 per year or less will not see an increase in the chances that they are audited," she wrote in a letter to Rettig.

STILL BELIEVE THEM? I DON'T.

1 posted on 04/06/2024 7:02:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bttt


2 posted on 04/06/2024 7:03:34 PM PDT by linMcHlp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just never trust a Democrat, period.


3 posted on 04/06/2024 7:18:35 PM PDT by inchworm (al )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“small business or households earning $400,000 per year or less will not see an increase in the chances that they are audited,“
Note :”increase in the chances” now they have the money they can follow through on the original plan


4 posted on 04/06/2024 7:26:44 PM PDT by griswold3 (Truth, Beauty and Goodness. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bingo... they are going to destroy those who are being destroyed. Absolute psychopaths running the federal government right now...


5 posted on 04/06/2024 7:34:23 PM PDT by WinstonSmith1984 (Make 1984 fiction again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
... the IRS audits well-off but not "rich" taxpayers because they can't afford the army of tax attorneys that the super-rich can bring to the table.

Not to mention that most of the "super-rich" have broken no tax laws because a) the consequences are higher for them if they do and b) they have excellent tax attorneys and excellent accountants to make sure their returns are flawless.

6 posted on 04/06/2024 7:55:48 PM PDT by TigersEye (Our Republic is under seige by globalist Marxists. Hold fast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The new reportable transaction level is $600.00. Who did you think they were going after? The threshhold is so low that the enforcement needed more stooges to do the work and what is interesting they are having trouble even getting people to apply. I guess a possible toxic work environment is not were people want to be.
7 posted on 04/06/2024 8:11:19 PM PDT by Liaison (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Anyone who thought it would be otherwise s an obedient serf...

The tenacity of our tyrannical communist rulers in imposing more & more tyranny is unmatched by those GOPers seeking (supposedly) to protect our Constitutional freedoms & liberties...

8 posted on 04/06/2024 8:51:57 PM PDT by SuperLuminal ( Where is Samuel Adams when we so desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inchworm

Trust that they are lying to you


9 posted on 04/06/2024 9:02:14 PM PDT by cableguymn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: inchworm

“Just never trust a Democrat, period.”
That’s been the case for over 165 years.


10 posted on 04/06/2024 9:20:32 PM PDT by wjcsux (On 3/14/1883 Karl Marx gave humanity his best gift, he died. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There's almost zero difference between them. Nazis were actually better than today's democrat.


11 posted on 04/06/2024 10:10:23 PM PDT by Boomer (If the Nazi-Rats and Rinos win, everyone loses. The Uniparty can no longer claim they are American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They have always been auditing “the rich”. It never ends. 80,000 auditors would not be needed for a function that’s been ongoing since tax auditing started.


12 posted on 04/06/2024 11:05:17 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No! @I’m-flabergasted


13 posted on 04/06/2024 11:14:38 PM PDT by Bullish (...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

What’s missing form that list?... Oh yeah, death camps.


14 posted on 04/06/2024 11:15:47 PM PDT by Bullish (...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The IRS was lying, surely you jest?


15 posted on 04/07/2024 12:38:27 AM PDT by Roadrunner383 (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, putting aside the ubiquitous lying by Demorats, what do you think IRS would do first, spend a few weeks fighting with someones’s CPA over an $8000 743(b) partnership depreciation adjustment or spend 5 minutes with the person who claimed $8,000 of refundable tax credits for the children she claimed to have but weren’t hers?

Hence, the statistic.


16 posted on 04/07/2024 12:53:02 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We are not free.
This happened because congress let them.. Not a fight in them.


17 posted on 04/07/2024 12:58:27 AM PDT by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I never knowingly do business with a Democrat or befriend them. They are inherently untrustworthy. No morals at all.


18 posted on 04/07/2024 2:32:23 AM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It is my belief that the extra audit help was primarily for anyone donating to a Trump or Trump adjacent campaign.


19 posted on 04/07/2024 4:46:30 AM PDT by daku
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have no love for the IRS, or its expansion.

But, I suspect that $200,000 is net income on a return. So that number can be a little misleading.

When my wife’s brother in law passed 14 years ago, I got to unravel their web of finances. He was grossing $700k a year, and his net was less than $150k. He was cheating so blatantly, that my wife and I worried for 7 years that there would be an audit that would ruin her sister.

As a side note, the man was a rabid democrat that advocated loudly for higher taxes.


20 posted on 04/07/2024 5:22:55 AM PDT by laxcoach (The secret to happiness is a bait pen full of pinfish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson