Skip to comments.
Federal Appeals Court Rejects ‘Invasion’ Claims, Issues New Block on Texas Immigration Law That Gives Police Power to Arrest Illegal Aliens
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^
| 3/27/2024
| cristina laila
Posted on 03/27/2024 8:53:14 PM PDT by bitt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
1
posted on
03/27/2024 8:53:14 PM PDT
by
bitt
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
2
posted on
03/27/2024 8:53:32 PM PDT
by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=30%>)
To: bitt
Nowhere in constitution or any of its amendments is there a specific reference to “immigration.”
3
posted on
03/27/2024 8:58:35 PM PDT
by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
To: bitt
Texas should keep enforcing it, claiming the courts are confusing and that they’ll revisit once the court resolves is conflicting opinions.
4
posted on
03/27/2024 8:59:44 PM PDT
by
Reno89519
(If Biden is mentally unfit to stand trial, he is mentally unfit to be president. He needs to resign.)
To: bitt
Who is inducing this court to make such ludicrous decisions?
To: bitt
***
Federal Appeals Court Rejects ‘Invasion’ Claims, Issues New Block on Texas Immigration Law That Gives Police Power to Arrest Illegal Aliens***
The Bitem Admin ignores the courts and now the governors like Abbot will have to do so! Imagine a judge saying that you cannot enforce the law and you can no longer protect your citizens --- think where this is headed either way! :^(
6
posted on
03/27/2024 9:07:40 PM PDT
by
Bob Ireland
(The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
To: bitt
two to one decision - Smirking Chimp stooge Priscilla Richman and Biden stooge Irma Carrillo Ramirez, with Trump judge Andrew S. Oldham dissenting.
7
posted on
03/27/2024 9:13:19 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(what Odessa doink?)
To: bitt
Illegals used to be arrested here in Los Angeles.
I’ve seen them driven away in busses headed for the border.
8
posted on
03/27/2024 9:14:19 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for which it stands. )
To: Bob Ireland
two to one decision - Smirking Chimp stooge Priscilla Richman and Biden stooge Irma Carrillo Ramirez, with Trump judge Andrew S. Oldham dissenting.
9
posted on
03/27/2024 9:16:08 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(what Odessa doink?)
To: kiryandil
***two to one decision***
If we ever regain control of our Republic, judges are one chicken coop that will have to be thoroughly cleaned❗
10
posted on
03/27/2024 9:20:39 PM PDT
by
Bob Ireland
(The Democrap Party is the enemy of freedom.They use all the seductions and deceits of the Bolshevics)
To: Bob Ireland
11
posted on
03/27/2024 9:23:25 PM PDT
by
deks
(Deo duce, ferro comitante · God for guide, sword for companion)
To: bitt
The Supremes are a feckless moth eaten bunch.
12
posted on
03/27/2024 9:24:27 PM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
(LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
To: bitt
In March 2024, the Supreme Court allowed Texas to enforce a controversial law that would allow state law enforcement officials to arrest individuals suspected of entering the United States illegally. <
Since they are the court of last resort, Texas & Abbott should ignore this 5th District Appeals Court ruling, and let them try to enforce their ruling.
Time to fight just like the leftist fight.
To: bitt
How many Divisions does the 5th Circuit Court command ?
NONE !
Then F#CK’EM!
14
posted on
03/27/2024 9:43:36 PM PDT
by
5th MEB
(1)
To: bitt
Are these judges trying to kill America?
Why?
15
posted on
03/27/2024 9:44:14 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
To: bitt
Abbott should tell these two moron “judges” to screw off and just go ahead and arrest the illegals.
Biden ignored the Supreme Court ruling on student loans in order to buy votes, so why can’t Gov. Abbott ignore this ridiculous ruling by the Appellate Court?
16
posted on
03/27/2024 9:50:27 PM PDT
by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(Disband and Defund the putrid FBI. America does not need an out of control Gestapo)
To: Sgt_Schultze
Nope. It only mentions “naturalization”.
They made up the bit about Federal supremacy over immigration by equating it to naturalization.
And in the case of this decision, we now have a federal court deciding what constitutes an Invasion. Gosh, when the Red Army is pouring across the border at Eagle Pass, will the military have to check with the local District court to see if it’s OK to fight back?
17
posted on
03/27/2024 9:59:06 PM PDT
by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
To: bitt
How on earth does a lower court countermand (right word?) a SCOTUS ruling???
18
posted on
03/27/2024 10:22:52 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming)
To: Reno89519
Absolutely, if I were Texas I’d say the Supreme Court already ruled on this and we are following them, not you. Unfortunately Texas ain’t what it used to be, so we’ll see.
19
posted on
03/27/2024 10:28:08 PM PDT
by
Golden Eagle
(Principles, not partisanship)
To: bitt
Exactly how do these zoomies know this isn’t an invasion? How do they know that the leaders of some of these countries aren’t actively sending many of these men to America? And, since all Democrats voted against ending funding for flying illegal aliens into the U.S., how do they know that the Democrat party is also not involved in the invasion? Bunch of pissants.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson