Posted on 03/18/2024 10:15:11 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Back when the Biden administration passed the hilariously named Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), a significant debate broke out over a provision that would funnel massive amounts of money to the Internal Revenue Service. The funds would supposedly go to hire an army of new agents who would diligently work to ensure that everyone was "paying their fair share" of taxes and that government revenue was predicted to increase.
Conservatives pushed back hard against the plan, but most of the IRS funding survived. Yet the anticipated benefits have still yet to show up. The reason for this, according to a new report from the Inspector General for Tax Administration is that a sufficient number of qualified people have not been applying for the new jobs at the tax agency, and the hiring process is bogged down. So why is it that people don't want these jobs? (Government Executive)
A new report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration on the initial implementation of the IRA found IRS is failing to bring on its first wave of specialists to focus on increasing compliance for large corporations, large partnerships and high-income/high-wealth individuals. The agency has made some progress—it has eliminated barriers to posting job openings—but is still facing headwinds that are largely outside of its control. Revenue agents for those roles have “yet to be hired and onboarded,” the IG said.
“External applications that have been received are far below the IRS targeted goal and there is an overall shortage of individuals with the desired background and experience,” TIGTA found.
A previous IG report found that despite its new funding, revenue agent staffing had actually decreased by 8%, or more than 650 employees, between the end of fiscal 2019 and March 2023. IRS had planned to bring on 3,833 revenue agents in fiscal 2023, but in the first six months officials had recruited just 34.
The targeted hiring goals are being missed by a wide margin. As noted in the linked report, staffing at the IRS actually fell by almost ten percent between 2019 and 2023. Since the IRA passed, the agency had planned to hire nearly 4,000 new agents last year. They actually wound up bringing on 34 new people.
The Inspector General notes that the number of people applying for these jobs is far lower than the targeted hiring goal. And among those who do apply, too many do not have the requisite background and education. There are likely a variety of reasons for this, starting with the current, low unemployment rate. There simply aren't all that many people looking for work. Also, people with a background in accounting can find jobs in the private sector that pay considerably more than the government does.
While it would be a far more difficult metric to track, it's also possible that there may be something of a stigma attached to working for the IRS in the current era. Many friends and neighbors will likely applaud you if you announce that you are enlisting in the military and they might not pay all that much attention if you go to work for another agency. But when you say that you're working for the tax man, people may be immediately reminded of how the IRS sometimes audits them. Even if not, they can't help but notice the massive bite that's taken out of their paychecks every month. That's not the fault of the individual agents of course. We need to blame Congress for that. But the association still likely remains in people's minds.
The IRS is doing what it can to combat the problem. They are dedicating more resources to bringing on recruiters and developing new advertising strategies to attract applicants. The agency has received expedited hiring authority in an effort to speed up the process, but it hasn't had much of an impact so far. The IG notes that the time between receiving an application from a qualified candidate and their actual start date is still hovering around 110 days. That's a lot of red tape to cut through when an applicant can typically be onboarded at a private sector accounting firm far faster and likely at a higher salary.
Another challenge is the fact that the IRA funds being used for this attempted expansion are temporary. Unless a new, similar bill is passed (which looks unlikely at this point), the extra money will run out in the next few years. That means that the expanded staffing levels won't be able to be maintained and some workers will either need to be let go or seek jobs in other government agencies. All of this adds up to a distinct possibility that the administration's dreams of draining the bank accounts of people who have "too much money" may have to be put on hold for a while longer.
The IRS is just a bunch of overpriced paper pushers.
Who would want to work for them?
Second problem is that IRS management has no idea as to how to address the situation.
LOL. The IRS can’t find enough diversity hires that can also speak somewhat coherent English, read, and do math (or at least use a calculator).
10% flat tax. No deductions.
Corporate and personal income taxes could be reported on a postcard.
Less government corruption. Cut the IRS by 95%
Is there an age limit? I know accounting. I want a badge and a gun. How much do they pay? How many years do I have to work before I can get retirement benefits?
9-9-9. It’s not just for pizza anymore.
I tease, but I sort of agree with you. Just simplify the tax code. The postcard idea. Though I could argue in principle that no wage earner should pay income taxes, as a compromise I think if you make say $70k or less ($140k for a family) you should pay zero income tax. It is human nature to work to provide for your family. This is in our DNA going back to Stone Age cave dwelling hunter gatherers. We always had to work, it’s just changed to where instead of hunting and picking fruits we trade our labor for cash to buy meat and vegetables. We should not be taxed for earning wages that pay for food and shelter. We should not be taxed for necessities and doing what we are naturally inspired to do. And index that number to inflation.
Other economic activity, we can debate whether it can be taxed and how much, but for regular people doing regular work to feed themselves and their clan - it should not be taxed; or at least not taxed below an amount that covers food, shelter, medical care, transportation and other basic human needs. It’s absolutely insidious to tax our human nature.
Who wants to be the shake down man for the looters? The one responsible for getting the salary of bureaucrats who harass us? Who wants to work for evil?
great news.
And they gaslit everyone by saying those many thousands of new IRS hires didn’t exist.
“That’s not in there, that’s anon conspiracy talk!”
Too many straight white men applying.
Not enough LGBT people of color with the required math, financial, and accounting skills.
It's only complicated because they intentionally designed it that way. The whole process of collecting taxes could be simplified and expedited and we could element the tax burden of thousands in the government sector. A win win.
Er...Eliminate the tax burden of thousands in the government sector.
I’d rather shovel chicken chit with a spoon than work for the gooberment. I have some standards.
The IRS checks the tax records of anyone who applies to work for them. Just a word to the wise...
No problem!
Biden will simply announce that he has a pool of 60,000,000 migrant invader vermin (MIVs) from which the IRS can find ample qualified candidates...
Golly, “it’s also possible that there may be something of a stigma attached to working for the IRS in the current era.” Who could imagine that working for a notoriously nasty and thuggish agency of the federal government might carry a stigma?
Like the Military and Police Departments the likes of Nashville’s the requirements will be neutered to meet their woke DEI agenda. The IRS’s future qualifications for employment will consist of the following question. 1. “Have you ever filed a 1040ez form with TurboTax software? If yes, hired!
They lie.
Where do you think those tech lay offs went?
But cpas and many government workers would lose their jobs
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.