Posted on 03/14/2024 3:06:39 PM PDT by Coronal
So disappointing, but not unexpected.
Reuters take on things.
Cannon, who was appointed to her post by Trump, ruled that question “warrants serious consideration” but should not be decided at this point.
That’s not dismissing, is it? She just says, “at this point.”
But Biden, who appears guilty of much worse, skates free.
COMPLETE BS
Quite possible that she’s playing the same game as the NeverTrumpers and running out the clock...we shall see.
I hope she is being political here...”Needs consideration” could mean, let’s wait until we get a better political bump from the decision.
Julie Kelly said the same thing would happen “As expected” but she also expects her to dismiss the case based on selective prosecution..there is more rulings to come on this matter
But Biden can walk out of a bunch of SCIF’s over a 47 year period with documents that normally would buy you a 45 year sentence for taking. Nothing happens to him. Just an old guy, no big deal.
The judiciary and the DoJ are now done in this country. The illegitimate power they have seized has to be undone. Trying to tie the President up in legal tar was never the intention of any of the Founders or the States.
The gallows have already been erected in the town square. They’ll jail him in October and hang him in November.
Wow! Our judicial system is completely effing broken. And all day the effin rats were crying in there lattes…I bet you tonight they’ll be effin celebrating. THERE IS NO JUSTICE ANYMORE only corruption. FJB gets nothing Trump on the other hand gets a jury and a sentence….INCREDIBLE! Jack smith is smiling tonight!!
Friday? Tomorrow or last week?
Yes.
Judges often look for the latest possible "off ramp" before making a controversial decision. They don't want to be too premature in making a ruling when there are still other things that can happen before the ruling becomes the last resort.
An exception would be when the motion is so clear-cut and decisive that the ruling makes sense at that moment, such as a tainted warrant or falsified evidence or obvious prosecutorial misconduct or witness/jury tampering where a mistrial is called for.
-PJ
” A federal judge on Friday denied former U.S. President Donald Trump’s request to dismiss a criminal case that charges him with illegally holding onto classified documents after leaving the White House.”
Interesting. Especially since today is Thursday.
There were two motions filed..the selective prosecution one might be the one she dismisses this case on
I'm leaning this way. Running out the clock is probably doing him a favor.
The good new is Trump now sees NOT to take the advice of the GOP-e when appointing judges.
Maybe there was time travel involved.
Yep! Don’t ever underestimate these wicked evil black robes. Do it at your own risk. I knew from the get-go since this morning when reports were coming out that the judge sounded skeptical and hammering that evil SOB demonJack Smith that she was not going to pull the trigger. No, I did not have insight, but they’re all a click. The black robes are part of club. You do not stab those higher-ups in judicial branch. It’s like doctors never speak evil of one another or second-guess their surgeries. Too many grand delusions were coming out of that courthouse. Yes I am extremely disappointed, but not surprised, not shocked, they’re evil.
Seems Obozo is telling them to drag trial out as long as possible.....
Hitlery also....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.