Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At least 50 injured after technical problem causes 'strong movement' on Boeing flight
Just the News ^ | 3/11/24 | Madeline Hubbard

Posted on 03/11/2024 5:51:07 AM PDT by CFW

Passengers were thrown to the roof of a Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner during a sudden altitude loss that resulted in at least 50 people being injured Monday on a LATAM Airlines flight.

The plane experienced a technical issue that caused "strong movement" on the flight from Sydney, Australia, to Auckland, New Zealand, according to The New Zealand Herald.

Of the approximately 50 people who were injured, a dozen were transported to local hospitals and one person was left in serious condition. The injuries included broken bones and head and neck injuries, per passenger Brian Jokat.

Jokat said the plane "just dropped" just over halfway through the flight.

Another passenger, identified as Daniel, said the incident was so chaotic it was difficult to tell whether the plane's interior was splattered with blood or wine.

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: airtravel; crashes; planes; technicalissues
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: fireman15

Downfall: the case against Boeing. Check it out on Netflix.

Boeing did this to themselves.


61 posted on 03/11/2024 9:31:53 AM PDT by hillarys cankles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Sorry FRiend. I don’t think you comprehended what I posted. Big jet airliners have lots of activity going on during flights. People have to pee, etc...


62 posted on 03/11/2024 9:51:43 AM PDT by EVO X ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
all this recent stuff appears to fall on poor maintenance.

… and how many warnings related to pressurization did aircrew have prior to the blowout? The “hero” aircrew that landed the plane safely for some reason did not preserve the record of their flight. We will never know what was discussed in the cockpit prior to the liftoff of the flight. Why did the “hero” pilot not have the knowledge to pull the circuit breaker for her flight data voice recorder? Things that make you go hmmmmm. We know that this aircraft had maintenance squawks related to pressurization. But somehow we are supposed to believe they were unrelated to the blowout.

63 posted on 03/11/2024 9:59:49 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CFW

turbulance right?


64 posted on 03/11/2024 10:34:27 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hillarys cankles
Downfall: the case against Boeing. Check it out on Netflix.

Yes, because Netflix loves American industry and workers so much!

Boeing has made plenty of mistakes over the years, but the criticism you find in the media is mostly and in “documentaries” such as the one from Netflix is mostly pure crap.

65 posted on 03/11/2024 10:46:29 AM PDT by fireman15 (Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Texan4Life

“Some on Reddit are saying that the pilot’s controls went completely dark for a few seconds, and then came back on.”

my first thought was temporary failure/glitch in fly-by-wire-by-computer-by-software-by-sensor ...thank god it was temporary ... next time might not be so temporary ... NTSB final report will be that “emanations” from consumer electronics MIGHT be the problem ...


66 posted on 03/11/2024 10:50:35 AM PDT by catnipman (A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jasonandtheb

You could get the impression that the media is doing to Boeing what MAGA did to bud light. And, it’s not by accident.


67 posted on 03/11/2024 11:25:07 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: missnry
"Why did the “hero” pilot not have the knowledge to pull the circuit breaker for her flight data voice recorder?"

Yes, the flight crew should have known that model did not have the long-duration voice recorder and they needed to pull the breaker from overwriting the data. This sounds more like a training and checklist error to me.


"We know that this aircraft had maintenance squawks related to pressurization."

Agreed...those pressurization warnings (whistling air sound by the plug) were ignored. That whistling noise should have been a HUGE red flag and grounded the aircraft immediately. So that makes it a combined operations, maintenance, AND manufacturing error. Blame shared between Boeing and the airline.

68 posted on 03/11/2024 11:27:36 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Reminds me of coming back from Mexico on AeroMexico decades ago.

We joked that the pilot must have been a dive bomber pilot earlier.

He would not just ease back the throttle to descend, he would nose down.

Got to where several of us would yell DIVE, DIVE! when you would do it.


69 posted on 03/11/2024 12:24:30 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fireman15

I guess most people do take one source and run with it. Do your homework, which I do, because I find it interesting, and make your own conclusion. I know morning is a shit company. You don’t want to believe it, well good for you.


70 posted on 03/11/2024 12:44:20 PM PDT by hillarys cankles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: hillarys cankles

Boeing


71 posted on 03/11/2024 12:44:49 PM PDT by hillarys cankles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: CFW
Glazer did, however,

In altitude?

How far??

For how long???

72 posted on 03/11/2024 3:23:28 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hillarys cankles
I guess most people do take one source and run with it. Do your homework, which I do, because I find it interesting, and make your own conclusion. I guess most people do take one source and run with it. Do your homework, which I do, because I find it interesting, and make your own conclusion.

My wife and I live outside of Seattle on a small airport near the foothills. A bunch of our neighbors and friends work for Boeing. Most of the professional pilots on the field fly or have flown Boeing jets. We bought our house from someone who worked for Boeing. WE just sold our other house using a real estate agent who worked retired from Boeing. My best aviation enthusiast buddy worked his entire career at Boeing. My brother has been an airline captain flying Boeing jets for decades. My wife and I both volunteer at the spectacular flight museum on Boeing Field that was founded by Boeing. My grandmother worked as a Rosie the Riveter during WWII for Boeing. We have been members of the Boeing Credit Union for years. And it goes on and on.

We are both pilots, have two aircraft and four hang gliders. We are aviation enthusiasts who hang out mostly with other aviation enthusiasts and pilots. When we are not flying for real, we relax by flying flight simulators. That is just how we are. Is Boeing a perfect company? Obviously not! Almost everyone who works at Boeing or flies their aircraft or knows Boeing employees has a love/hate relationship with the current management. But, do you think that the Chinese will produce better aircraft than Boeing does? Do you think that Airbus would produce better aircraft if they didn't have to compete with Boeing?

So... you have done your research and have concluded that Boeing is “shit company”? Good for you! My guess is that the piece of finger nail that I just clipped off knows more about flying and Boeing than you do. You are just an easily influenced person who has bought into crap put out by people who won't be happy until every manufacturing job in the USA has been shipped overseas. You should be embarrassed by your ignorance and gullibility but you won't because you are an almost perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

73 posted on 03/11/2024 6:45:27 PM PDT by fireman15 (Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: moovova
The CEO is a drag queen.

Seriously.

Seriously?

You cannot keep your CEOs straight. The CEO of United Airlines is the one who dresses up in women's clothing.

74 posted on 03/11/2024 7:01:35 PM PDT by fireman15 (Irritating people are the grit from which we fashion our pearl. I provide the grit. You're Welcome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fireman15
You cannot keep your CEOs straight.

Or 25% of the 'actors' in TV commercials, either.

75 posted on 03/12/2024 3:30:50 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson