Posted on 03/10/2024 11:09:15 AM PDT by Ennis85
Angling for a possible VP selection?
Can I ask a stupid question?
Legally ,we know homosexual marriage is permitted Nationwide because of a Supreme Court decision.
But we also know, legally speaking , Virginia has a state Constitutional Amendment banning same-sex marriage.
If the Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage were ever overturned, wouldn’t the existing state Constitutional Amendment then become effective again?
How can a regular statute law signed by the governor override the state Constitutional Amendment?
If activists in Virginia are really concerned about protecting same-sex marriage, wouldn’t they have to work to overturn the Constitutional Amendment, and not just have a regular statute law signed by the governor?
Nice guy but we have enough societal faggotism and gay “marriage” is a sham. People with sexual disorders should NEVER be given children not their own.
Or why I hate GOP “moderates.”
“The proposal undermines the tangible link between substance use and harm to children,” Youngkin said. …Nothing about the tangible link between same-sex “marriage” and harm to children though.
Agreed. So beyond sick of the kowtowing to the sodomite faction. It’s nauseating.
Because the Virginia Constitution’s marriage amendment has been ruled unconstitutional. It is therefore unenforceable. Virginia’s legislature has passed a law in compliance with the US Supreme Court’s ruling.
If the USSC ever reverses itself on homosexual marriage, then the Virginia amendment would again be constitutional and enforceable, and the law just passed would then be ruled as unconstitutional by Virginia courts and be voided.
Not a shot. Youngkin is way too smart for that.
🤣👍
Thank God, I was really worried about faggots being fake married. Hopefully someday they find a cure for being a homo and I never have to see a rainbow flag again.
Very disappointing. He had nothing to lose from vetoing this disgusting bill.
“Very disappointing. He had nothing to lose from vetoing this disgusting bill.”
Yes he did — 1st amendment protections for clergy and others who morally oppose being forced to perform the marriages. His signature codifies their refusal as protected speech in Virginia.
But what about businesses facing the possibility of having to participate in them?
It is called the “RINO blink”...
Yuck. Why would he feel the need for a marriage equality bill? Such a bill is an embrace of the same denial of reality as does transgender validation. Might as well declare a horse a unicorn.
Otherwise his positions seem acceptable
https://virginiamercury.com/2021/11/01/cheat-sheet-youngkin-and-mcauliffe-on-the-issues/
Senate
Should veto anything democrats send him.
You have to be kidding. So, the First Amendment alone wasn’t sufficient without this bill to protect clergy against being forced to perform non-marriages? You have no idea what this legislation does.
My guess is that it’s a case of leftists simply ignoring the laws they don’t like.
“You have to be kidding. So, the First Amendment alone wasn’t sufficient without this bill to protect clergy against being forced to perform non-marriages? You have no idea what this legislation does.”
Perhaps you would like to elaborate on what this legislation does?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.