Tulsi Gabbard speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Md., on Thursday, February 22, 2024.
Posted on 03/05/2024 4:47:59 AM PST by Jim Noble
Your entire argument is based on bullshit terminology. Trump getting in bed with a hard-core leftist like Gabbard is death to his candidacy.
I do not agree. Byron Donalds would be a far better pick. He can articulate MAGA. I don’t think Tulsi can.
“Gabbard”
A better-looking version of Hubert Humphrey?
“Like it or not, the SCOTUS does not exist to enforce anyone’s opinion on reality. They exist to conclude whether an action is or is not constitutional.”
Based on real history this is absolutely NOT TRUE. It is how it is “supposed to be” but by example it is not the case.
I wasn’t familiar with the author so I gave him the benefit of the doubt and was halfway through it when it became all too clear I’d wasted my time.
Tulsi Gabbard.
Trump would lose more voters than he’d gain.
He’d still lose Hawaii.
She’s all for abortion and every other leftist nightmare.
Anyone who’d find her appealing as a veep, is extremely unlikely to vote for Trump.
She’s the choice if you’re a Sports Illustrated fanatic.
Big Mike would make a Tulsi VP choice mandatory.
(...and we’d still lose...)
“With Biden’s disapproval rating reaching historic lows of 59%”
I think the writer means “DISapproval... historic HIGHS”
It doesn’t really matter. They don’t care. They have their plan laid out a and are confident in the outcome.
The Republican margin in the House is so slim that we can’t afford to lose a single member even for a short time.
Many congressmen are old and we might be one heart attack away from a Democratic House and total Democratic ability to pass laws.
Tulsi Gabbard is an attractive Milf liberal Hawaian Democrat. Please keep your fetishes to the bedroom, thanks.
One factor to consider is that the Democrats may be waiting to decide on whether or not to run Biden based in part on who Trump’s VP pick is. And the longer they wait, the more locked in on Biden they get, which for our side is a good thing.
Plus, the longer Trump can wait to decide, the more publicity our side gets, which for our side is a good thing.
“He can articulate MAGA. I don’t think Tulsi can.”
Tulsi can’t; she isn’t MAGA.
Donalds seems like he’d be an OK pick. There are some good people to choose from. (Some really bad names are being thrown around, too. 🙄 )
The delusion of Devos promotes a misbegotten notion when the enemy of America is the Democrat party. Blaming problems on a globalist boogieman is just ignorant.
This is one of those “let’s move left” opinions (so that even when they lose they win).
This article is nonsense.
“He can articulate MAGA”
Your theory is that what you call MAGA can win large majorities in the House and Senate and make Trump President, but you are wrong.
[I wasn’t familiar with the author so I gave him the benefit of the doubt and was halfway through it when it became all too clear I’d wasted my time.]
yep
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.