Tulsi Gabbard speaks during the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Md., on Thursday, February 22, 2024.
Posted on 03/05/2024 4:47:59 AM PST by Jim Noble
Now that the Supreme Court has unanimously destroyed the dreams of Davos to use January 6th as a means to keep him off the ballot, Donald Trump has passed the easiest of the hurdles in front of his returning to the White House.
Some things, politically, in the US still function.
This ruling was a lay-up. The SCOTUS had to rule decisively here.
Trump was never convicted of ‘insurrection.’ He was impeached and character-assassinated, sure, but none of that carries any weight of law. But, even if you somehow believe he was guilty of the crimes the Democrats accused him of, the facts of January 6th are so murky from that perspective, there was no way the SCOTUS could concoct a justification for his ballot disqualification.
At stake itself was the SCOTUS’ own validity as an institution. And if there is one thing I believe about organizations it is they always move to defend themselves if their leadership is honest.
Like it or not, the SCOTUS does not exist to enforce anyone’s opinion on reality. They exist to conclude whether an action is or is not constitutional. Did Trump ever lead an armed insurrection against the government? No.
Did he question a questionable election? Yes.
Is that unconstitutional? No.
Case closed.
But this case was an important first step to shut off the Nikki Haley insurgent strategy of handing delegates to her by default:
Take Trump off the ballot. She’s now the only “Repuglican” left to vote for. She gets to go to the convention with a bunch of unearned delegates to steal the election before November.
Oops. Now she gets further embarrassed on Super Tuesday.
Now the strategy backfires completely and he’s now Obi-Don Kenobi.
Unless somehow Jack Smith or the Fulton County Gang that Can’t Lie Straight put him in jail Trump is the GOP nominee.
So, now, how does Trump take this political resurrection and change the game completely?
With Biden’s disapproval rating reaching historic lows of 59% (6 out of 10 US votes HATE JOAH! Biii-Den!), the path to the White House for Trump goes through Vice-President Kamala Harris.
While conversations abound about subbing in Big Mike and/or Gavin Gruesome, the more likely threat from the DNC is Hillary, who is clearly angling back into the conversation as Biden falters.
But whoever Trump winds up running against, there is one person who Trump can leverage to drive even more people who hate him bat-shit crazy than he does.
And he knows who that is. So, as Primary Trump morphs, just like in 2016, into Candidate Trump, he will look to shore up his weaknesses.
Candidate Trump became a guy who preached bringing the US back from a dark place. He ran on a populist platform that incorporated the Bernie Bros (remember them) as well as the tradesmen.
He broke the Democrats’ Trinity of Victimhood – Unions, Minorities, young people — that was their base and squeaked to victory over The Hildabeast.
If you think it’s Trump’s team or even US ‘white hats’ pushing out this stuff about Biden, you may be missing the obvious player, Hillary.
If there is one thing I know for certain about Trump it is that he’s a master of media. He knows exactly how and when to push everyone’s buttons.
For that reason (and many others) Trump’s only real choice for running mate is Tulsi Gabbard.
At a minimum, right now, Trump is using Gabbard, bringing her into the VP conversation. She’s okay with this. She’s allowing herself to be used by him. It’s mutually beneficial.
I’m well on the record as being a Gabbard fan (some would say simp… whatever). It doesn’t matter whether you trust her or not. It’s not about you. It’s about perception. And, for better or worse, Gabbard has a now long track record of service to the country that is honest.
She was someone targeted from the beginning as someone the DNC could groom into shape. Young, attractive, woman of color, veteran. Boxes are ticking off left and right. And those are all attributes that she still has which Trump doesn’t.
When Hillary stole the 2016 primary from Bernie Sanders she resigned from the DNC. This is a woman who crossed Hillary Clinton and, so far, has lived to tell the tale. No mean feat in the 21st century.
Long story short, Gabbard has stones. Some would call them principles, but that’s a stretch to ascribe those to any politician. She told Davos to go scratch. She told Hillary to slag-off.
And in 2024, she’s an ex-Democrat ,on Fox News, headlining at CPAC etc. Is she a stalking horse for the establishment? I don’t think so. Is she a grifter who just wants to trade up from the collection of dead-enders that are the current Democrats? Maybe.
Again, I don’t care about these things, because here’s the real story.
Trump needs to run as a real Unity candidate. He’s destroyed the GOPe’s (GOP establishment) gaggle of neocons. Now, he needs to seal the deal with the emerging Radical Center I discussed in a recent article.
That {being for something better rather than against what is} becomes a decision point for a lot of people. It’s the moment when the established idea, brand, etc. wakes up to the threat and fights back. This is what the 16% chasm represents, that gulf between opposition and affirmation.
This is also what Davos and their ilk are truly exceptional at managing. They keep the Overton Window framed over irrelevant side issues to ensure that a new majority doesn’t “cross the 16% chasm,” by uniting over that better solution that doesn’t include them.
I’m calling this group they are afraid of, “The Radical Center.”
And every time I bring Gabbard up in the VP conversation I hear a whole lot of side issues discussed without actually addressing the core goals of how to save the country from collapsing into conflict.
So, allow me to make one of my lists of reasons why Trump has only one real choice for VP:
Former Democrat Congresswoman, veteran, former Trump critic. Loudly rejected the Democrats for becoming something unrecognizable Stood up to Hillary Clinton She destroyed Kamala Harris in a DNC debate Is fundamentally populist in most of her positions Is NOT dogmatic about key issues, having shifted off previous positions on guns, abortion, etc. Is not a warhawk, but rather supports Trump’s views on foreign policy She’s a negotiator and a moderate. She’s a patriot with a strong sense of honor and duty. Ran a pure grassroots campaign for President in 2020, no outside donor support. If you look at the totality of Gabbard’s record you see someone who is the opposite of Trump, but who winds up in the same place he did.
Politically, she is someone who neuters all of the Democrats’ screeching about Trump hating women, being a Nahtsi, and dog whistling for the alt-Right.
If he picks Gabbard as his running mate he neuters all of those narratives with normies, softens Trump’s bombast, while leaving the media and Davos with nothing but “he’s pandering” as their fall back position.
That will backfire on them hard and they will take the bait, hook, line, and sinker.
And, like her or not, Gabbard is no Sarah Palin for them to pick apart. She’s seasoned at this level of the game.
Lastly, she is Globalist/Neocon Insurance as Trump is more compromised on this front than she is. And when you run through the Senate right now, who can you point to that doesn’t have huge stalking-horse-for-globalist vibes? Rubio? Scott? Rick or Tim?
Go through the Senate of possible people to succeed Trump and give me a good name you can trust to survive even the transition period between November and January.
If you could then some of them would have already tried for the job during the primaries. None of them wanted the Ron DeSantis treatment.
Of all the options for Trump only Gabbard is the person who can reach out to voters that matter, the ones in swing states/counties who are looking for our politics to focus on country first and ideology second.
The fundamental problem with all of this is that Trump is not a hard-ass. He’s a deal-maker. Gabbard is a consensus-builder. We need a hard-ass. You go to war with the Generals you have and the army you’ve built, not the ones you want.
Trump isn’t the General for this war I want, he’s the one I’ve got. And if my alternative is Harris, Gruesome, or Hitlary, then I want Trump to have the best possible VP for the job. I don’t want Mike Pence 2.0, which is how I see any of the mannequins in the Senate.
Will Trump do this? I have no idea. Should he do it? I honestly don’t think he has a real choice.
Your entire argument is based on bullshit terminology. Trump getting in bed with a hard-core leftist like Gabbard is death to his candidacy.
I do not agree. Byron Donalds would be a far better pick. He can articulate MAGA. I don’t think Tulsi can.
“Gabbard”
A better-looking version of Hubert Humphrey?
“Like it or not, the SCOTUS does not exist to enforce anyone’s opinion on reality. They exist to conclude whether an action is or is not constitutional.”
Based on real history this is absolutely NOT TRUE. It is how it is “supposed to be” but by example it is not the case.
I wasn’t familiar with the author so I gave him the benefit of the doubt and was halfway through it when it became all too clear I’d wasted my time.
Tulsi Gabbard.
Trump would lose more voters than he’d gain.
He’d still lose Hawaii.
She’s all for abortion and every other leftist nightmare.
Anyone who’d find her appealing as a veep, is extremely unlikely to vote for Trump.
She’s the choice if you’re a Sports Illustrated fanatic.
Big Mike would make a Tulsi VP choice mandatory.
(...and we’d still lose...)
“With Biden’s disapproval rating reaching historic lows of 59%”
I think the writer means “DISapproval... historic HIGHS”
It doesn’t really matter. They don’t care. They have their plan laid out a and are confident in the outcome.
The Republican margin in the House is so slim that we can’t afford to lose a single member even for a short time.
Many congressmen are old and we might be one heart attack away from a Democratic House and total Democratic ability to pass laws.
Tulsi Gabbard is an attractive Milf liberal Hawaian Democrat. Please keep your fetishes to the bedroom, thanks.
One factor to consider is that the Democrats may be waiting to decide on whether or not to run Biden based in part on who Trump’s VP pick is. And the longer they wait, the more locked in on Biden they get, which for our side is a good thing.
Plus, the longer Trump can wait to decide, the more publicity our side gets, which for our side is a good thing.
“He can articulate MAGA. I don’t think Tulsi can.”
Tulsi can’t; she isn’t MAGA.
Donalds seems like he’d be an OK pick. There are some good people to choose from. (Some really bad names are being thrown around, too. 🙄 )
The delusion of Devos promotes a misbegotten notion when the enemy of America is the Democrat party. Blaming problems on a globalist boogieman is just ignorant.
This is one of those “let’s move left” opinions (so that even when they lose they win).
This article is nonsense.
“He can articulate MAGA”
Your theory is that what you call MAGA can win large majorities in the House and Senate and make Trump President, but you are wrong.
[I wasn’t familiar with the author so I gave him the benefit of the doubt and was halfway through it when it became all too clear I’d wasted my time.]
yep
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.