Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds Want To Ask Trump Jurors If 2020 Election Was 'Stolen'
Law360 ^

Posted on 03/01/2024 5:38:49 AM PST by Brilliant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: MayflowerMadam

......interesting......needs a good think.....


21 posted on 03/01/2024 6:33:42 AM PST by Liz (This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
if they believe the 2020 election was "stolen" and if they hold opinions about how the FBI executed a highly publicized search warrant at his Mar-a-Lago resort...

Do you have feelings about murder as a crime? WTF? Just ask someone if they are MAGA, RINO, or leftist?

22 posted on 03/01/2024 6:34:05 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I’d be excused......no stickers.


23 posted on 03/01/2024 6:35:49 AM PST by Liz (This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Actually, the judge should dismiss the case, with prejudice, based upon this request. That alone reveals that this is a political persecution, not an actual case with evidence before an impartial jury of one’s peers.


24 posted on 03/01/2024 6:36:25 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Are you a republican or democrat?


25 posted on 03/01/2024 6:36:36 AM PST by sasquatch (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Really. We might want to get good responses to a few different lib questions under our belts to use, “just in case”.


26 posted on 03/01/2024 6:37:17 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Fraud vitiates everything." - SCOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I haven’t received a jury summons in years.

And I am an eligible juror and have been for years.

Wanna bet Trump donors/supporters are already being weeded out from jury duty.

Betcha...


27 posted on 03/01/2024 6:44:22 AM PST by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

LOL.

What a great way to get out of jury duty, though.

State that the POTATUS was installed.

But Deep State won’t care.

Deep State soon won’t need trials, will it.

It will just pronounce guilt and sentence as it sees fit.


28 posted on 03/01/2024 6:47:30 AM PST by mewzilla (Never give up; never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Danie_2023

Since most of the left was more than happy to goose-step to Fauci’s perverted tune and will continue to jump through any hoop these crazed government dictators require, I have had a front row seat to witness them requesting to be exempt from jury duty due to ongoing illness. Sitting a jury that gets sidelined by myocarditis, autoimmune disease, TTS, and/or death has a high likelihood of a case ending up in mistrial.


29 posted on 03/01/2024 6:49:15 AM PST by anonsquared
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

If asked as a potential juror I would say, as I have from the beginning, that it remains an open question since there was never an official, all encompassing investigation.


30 posted on 03/01/2024 6:53:31 AM PST by Rowdyone (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Is there anyway to read the whole article? It’s hidden behind a paywall!


31 posted on 03/01/2024 6:54:18 AM PST by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Actually, the judge should dismiss the case, with prejudice, based upon this request. That alone reveals that this is a political persecution, not an actual case with evidence before an impartial jury of one’s peers.

^THIS^

Also if a prosecutor ever asked me if I had any - "opinions or concerns about a former president of the United States being charged with a crime.", I would immediately ask them: "Are you referring to Clinton, Obama, or Biden once he is out of office?"

32 posted on 03/01/2024 7:00:10 AM PST by anonsquared
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Just ask them if they are blue Rats, if not…disqualification…Justice system is a farce…


33 posted on 03/01/2024 7:07:16 AM PST by TnTnTn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This shows the absurdity of the attempt to prosecute the President.

There is NO jury in this country that won’t have partisan opinions of Trump, and that’s who’s really on trial.

The prosecution will argue essentially that there can be no Trump supporters...meaning that they will tolerate only Trump’s opposition.

A politically biased jury is nothing but a kangaroo court, a political show trial.


34 posted on 03/01/2024 7:21:07 AM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
It's beyond a violation of the First Amendment.

It has nothing to do with a criminal case involving alleged "classified" documents.

35 posted on 03/01/2024 7:24:20 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Most of the jurors who ended up being selected (me included) answered “None” to that question.


36 posted on 03/01/2024 7:24:55 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
I would have recited the first Amendment to that judge.

The judge would have responded: "How does the First Amendment apply here? You put the damned bumper sticker(s) on your car for the whole world to see."

37 posted on 03/01/2024 7:25:57 AM PST by Alberta's Child (If something in government doesn’t make sense, you can be sure it makes dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Lie.


38 posted on 03/01/2024 7:34:45 AM PST by moovova ("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

If a DOJ attorney asked me as a potential juror whether I thought the 2020 election was stolen, I’d have to answer truthfully. “After seeing all the dishonesty in the federal government, including at the DoJ, I think it could have been stolen and that we will never know.” I don’t think I would last long in the jury pool.


39 posted on 03/01/2024 7:36:45 AM PST by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Yes, I did. Not much more to it of great importance. In the first comment, I copied part that mentions a motion to dismiss filed by Trump’s co-defendants. If you remember, they filed charges against Trump’s employee because he moved the boxes. The employee’s defense, apparently, is that Trump told him to move the boxes, but he did not tell him what was in them.


40 posted on 03/01/2024 7:37:11 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson