Posted on 02/26/2024 4:54:33 PM PST by CFW
A judge has determined that Nathan Wade’s former law partner and divorce lawyer must tell the court what he knows about the special prosecutor’s relationship with District Attorney Fani Willis – a decision that could produce more bombshell testimony as defense attorneys seek to disqualify the DA from prosecuting the Fulton County election interference case.
Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee’s chambers notified attorneys in the case by email late Monday that certain communications Terrence Bradley had with Wade are not protected by attorney-client privilege, according to numerous people who read the email. Bradley could be compelled to testify as soon as Tuesday afternoon. McAfee’s decision followed a closed-door meeting between the judge and Bradley on Monday that lasted nearly an hour and 20 minutes.
A spokesman for Willis said the DA’s office cannot comment except in court.
Defense attorneys are seeking to disqualify the entire DA’s office because of what they have called an “improper” romantic relationship between Willis and Wade. The defense attorneys say Willis benefitted financially by hiring Wade because he paid for trips they took together with money he earned from the case.
Willis and Wade have testified they split the cost of travel roughly equally. And they said their relationship began months after she hired him to oversee the case in November 2021.
(Excerpt) Read more at ajc.com ...
Re: 31 - The case will not be dismissed because of the peccadillos of Wade and Willis.
This is about attorney misconduct. Wade and Willis will be removed because generally they are an embarrassment to the profession and specifically because of their conduct.
Nope....Perjury is a crime...that alone will take their licenses.
Judge rules Nathan Wade’s attorney must take the stand again in Trump election case: Sources
Terrence Bradley will testify on items not covered by attorney-client privilege.
BEFORE OR AFTER COURT???
IF THEY STEP OUT-—IS CASE CLOSED AGAINST TRUMP???
A SERIOUS DEEP DIVE AUDIT OF BOTH THE BILLING RECORDS & THE REST OF THEIR “RELATIONSHIP” NEEDS TO BE DONE & EXPOSED.
Let me sum up his testimony, “I don’t remember but if it occurred it was with my client, as my best recollection, possible, definitely a Maybe…..
I notice the judge is giving this attorney more leeway than he did Ms. Marchant. And, this attorney is definitely more demanding that she is. He certainly has Bradley rattled.
Mr. Bradley is not rattled, unless my client says I am rattled, but I could not recall if my client would or did say I was rattled.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.