Posted on 02/15/2024 12:03:36 PM PST by Red Badger
$#!7 has really hit the Fani in Fulton County.
On Thursday, special prosecutor Nathan Wade testified under oath that he charged several lavish vacations with DA Fani Willis to his corporate
The relationship between Wade and Willis is the subject of an evidentiary hearing as part of Willis’ sprawling racketeering case brought against former President Donald Trump and 18 co-defendants for their alleged efforts to overturn (or ‘correct’ – depending) the results of the 2020 US election in Georgia.
Wade also testified that his marriage was “irretrievably broken in 2015,” and that his wife agreed to a divorce – but they held off because their children were still in school.
Oh…
In a confirmation of what we reported last week from Wade’s divorce proceedings, a former “good friend” of Willis’ testified that her romantic relationship with Wade began after they met at the judicial conference in the fall of 2019, directly contradicting assertions made by Willis in court filings about the timing of their relationship. Willis claimed that she and Wade “have been professional associates and friends since 2019,” and that “there was no personal relationship” between her and Wade in Nov. 2021 when she hired Wade and paid him over $600,000 to help her prosecute Trump.
Appearing before Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee via Zoom, Yeartie said Willis and Wade may have begun dating in October or November 2019, shortly after the two met at the conference that year.
During questioning from Sadow, who is representing Trump in the case, Yeartie testified that Willis told her she was engaged in a romantic relationship with Wade in 2020 and 2021, and said she witnessed “hugging, kissing,” and “just affection” between the two before November 2021, when Wade was hired by Willis. -CBS News
Fulton County DA’s office lawyer Anna Cross attempted to raise doubts about Yeartie’s credibility, asking her questions about her performance while working for Willis, and whether she was ever disciplined for poor performance. Yeartie admitted that she’d been written up once, referencing a “situation” in which she was told she would be terminated if she didn’t resign.
This adds to previous reporting suggesting that Willis paid Wade’s divorce attorney!
You can watch a recap of Wade’s testimony below:
VIDEO AT LINK......................
“Fani Pounded ... “
Wording people, wording.
made ya click!
Headline writers having some fun there...
#MeToo? 😆😆
That is one smirking sleezy dude...
I dont think the judge is impressed...
Fanni Pounded.
Film at 11.
Never forget, these people are our ‘betters’........................
Fani Pounded? By Nathan Wade?
Fani pounded before flush.
Writer’s, these days.
In hindsight, this headline might be hammering her a bit too hard
Where does a DA get tens of thousands in cash with no receipts.
The only people I know who deal in cash with no receipts are drug addicts and drug dealers.
A DA can decline to prosecute drug dealers. Just saying.
Atlanta has a dirty Fani.
“Where does a DA get tens of thousands in cash with no receipts.”
In the envelopes from Soros, of course.
So Wade was charging personal travel with his girlfriend to his corporate credit card. I’m going to go wild and speculate that costs were taken as business expenses on his corporate books and that Fani’s purported “cash reimbursements” were not entered. So tax fraud, lying to the court, etc. Turn out the lights Nate, the party’s ovuh.
Fulton Co’s biggest cheaters and frauds were prosecuting an election case that has at its heart fraud by Fulton County election officials.
Bkmk
And suggestions that she used county funds to pay for his divorce lawyer.
I heard some of his testimony:
Idiot tried to play stupid re the difference between private & public funds.
Then again, Fanny Willing probably didn’t date him for his brain...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.