As I stated calling people names is high school debating and shows you have nothing to add to the conversation other than insults and name calling. It’s typical for a lot of people on FR, they just want to complain, they offer nothing to the debate, have no ideas of how to solve the issue other than to blindly support an obvious fraud.
The issue with someone like defending fraud is a lot Trump supporters don’t actually want to solve the issue, they just want something to complain about when they don’t win.
It doesn’t make me the least bit uncomfortable, it’s hard to be complimentary about someone advocating falsely about one of the single biggest issues in the USA, if we don’t have confidence in our election system, then we have no country.
You poor thing. Are you okay? Starting to wonder if you’re
too brittle to handle being disagreed with.
I wrote about certain aspects of this case that you ignored,
but you claimed I hadn’t added anything other than name
calling and insults. Is that fraud? Hmmm...
I’m not defending fraud. I didn’t defend Lindell about not
providing evidence. What I did say is that he had been a
loyal supporter of Trump, and that he had lost quite a
bit financially because of his beliefs.
So while he may not have done what you want, he was still
loyal and a decent sort after taking a real financial hit.
You don’t seem to be able to process a lot of what I’m
bring up for you to consider.
When I said you had exhibited the same thoughts about
Lindell that Hillary would express, you thought it was
name calling. No, it was just the statement of a fact.
I’m not going to stand by and watch someone try to trash
Lindell without giving them some feedback.
As long as you’re going to act like a moron, don’t be
surprised if I treat you like one.