Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

Department of Justice lists the cases surrounding the J6
event.

Anyone find the word insurrection there?

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/30-months-jan-6-attack-capitol


10 posted on 02/12/2024 2:36:44 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Can anyone actually be tried for insurrection?

Yes.

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1999-title18-section2383&num=0&edition=1999


13 posted on 02/12/2024 2:40:59 PM PST by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

“Anyone find the word insurrection there?”

It isn’t there. And the Colorado court has found him guilty of a crime he has neither been charged with or found guilty in a court proceeding.

“A bill of attainder is a piece of legislation that declares a party is guilty of a crime. Bills of attainder allow the government to punish a party for a perceived crime without first going through the trial process.

In the United States, bills of attainder are unconstitutional as stated in Article 1 Section 9 and Article 1 Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution. Article 9 prohibits federal bills of attainder and Article 10 prohibits bills of attainder
by the states. The constitutional ban on bills of attainder works to uphold separation of powers principles by preventing Congress from assuming the functions of the judicial branch.

https://www.google.com/search?q=can+a+judge+find+a+person+guilty+of++a+crime+he+has+not+been+chrged+with&sca_esv=4cfa0bda60f78d2e&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS957US957&ei=l6XKZfvfNOnB0PEPgsqxqA8&ved=0ahUKEwi7h4Kq9qaEAxXpIDQIHQJlDPUQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=can+a+judge+find+a+person+guilty+of++a+crime+he+has+not+been+chrged+with&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiSGNhbiBhIGp1ZGdlIGZpbmQgYSBwZXJzb24gZ3VpbHR5IG9mICBhIGNyaW1lIGhlIGhhcyBub3QgYmVlbiBjaHJnZWQgd2l0aDIGECEYChgKSOvIAVAAWNK6AXAAeACQAQCYAY8BoAHvBaoBAzcuMrgBA8gBAPgBAeIDBBgAIEHiAwUSATEgQA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

wy69


29 posted on 02/12/2024 3:22:18 PM PST by whitney69 (yption tunnels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
Murray made a grandiose play but misunderstood that he was solidifying his incompetence with that argument right off the bat. The Justices had already cornered themselves when they denied hearing evidence of multiple Election 2020 lawsuits and hiding behind a "no standing" declaration when entire states, as a group, of COURSE have standing. Especially on such monumental issues.

If you're a Supreme Court Justice and can't take the heat just resign and take checks from colleges and law firms like Hillary does, doing nothing. But please refrain being a parasite on third-world nations' misery like she does. Ick.

39 posted on 02/12/2024 4:00:19 PM PST by MikelTackNailer (Compare Trump never going back on his word to someone's 'word as a Biden'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson