Posted on 02/09/2024 8:43:47 PM PST by MNDude
Friday that a new artificial intelligence (AI) tool is putting clothes back on “e-girls” and removing their tattoos.
The post shows four examples of women wearing limited clothing next to what “DignifAI” thinks they should be wearing. The purpose of this creepy internet robot person is to bring “dignity back to the internet,” according to its Twitter account.
Political commentator Jack Posobiec said While this sounds like a nice idea, I’m not exactly sure how slut shaming confident women is going to help bring dignity back to the internet. Surely a better purpose for this type of AI would be to root out content like child pornography and delete it from the internet forever? Or perhaps me and this AI just have different definitions of the word “dignity.”
While this sounds like a nice idea, I’m not exactly sure how slut shaming confident women is going to help bring dignity back to the internet. Surely a better purpose for this type of AI would be to root out content like child pornography and delete it from the internet forever? Or perhaps me and this AI just have different definitions of the word “dignity.”
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
I for one love it, and I love the outraged reactions even more.
We are living in a post-reality world.
I’m just here for the “Before” and “After” pictures.
But I’ll settle for “Before”?
A good man protects and covers women and girls.
Way to go.
Given the examples shown, the “After” pictures made the women look more attractive.
Modesty is a winning formula!
The person, or persons, are using AI for putting clothing back on slutty chicks.
Asking them to find kiddie porn would get them arrested for kiddie porn.
I don’t think the author understands AI, or how it’s being used.
So much for me acting like I’m looking into a hard news source (The Daily Mail) while really concentrating on the salacious pictures on the right side of the page. I insist it’s not pornography...
But then again, The Daily Mail didn’t spend 22 months trying to convince me that Trump was in league with the ruskies, that Hillary didn’t do anything wrong, and that Hunter’s P.C. was fake...
So I think I’ll take the hotties and the truth.
I still remember the guy in the dorm at the university who said to me:
“What do you do when you see a naked girl?”
In a previous life I would “grab for all the gusto I can” now I’ve gained enough maturity to want to look the other way or want them clothed.
If someone wants to expose themselves that’s their choice.
It can also be my choice not to indulge in watching.
Taylor Swift was signing autographs 15 years ago at the local Walmart clothed in a way I could handle.
On stage in more recent years wow I don’t want to look.
I guess she wears more clothes at the NFL games so I guess I can watch her again in that context.
I think the idea is kind of cool, actually.
ditto
Now that’s being creative. Love it. Keep up the good work.
The tatted up woman without the all the tattoos looks much better. I don’t understand why an attractive woman would cover herself in ink it’s repulsive.
“God has assigned to every man the duty to protect the dignity of every woman.” Although I think this quote is much older, it is attributed to John Paul II. But whoever first said it, it is right on the mark. Men act in the most manly fashion when they set out to protect the dignity of every woman, despite how these women may choose to present themselves. Aim for the stars guys - even if we don’t reach them, we won’t exactly come up with a handful of mud either…
Any normal guy would pick the one one right.
Good AI work.
Now do Paris Jackson aka Michael Jackson’s “daughter”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
