[Carl Vehse]

I don’t trust Putin or anything he said to Carlson.

But, the fact that the enemedia and leftist politicians are upset about the interview is enjoyable.

[shanover]

TC is the new real face of journalism.

[canuck_conservative]

TUCKER: Do you see the United States as an enemy?

PUTIN: No. Categorically no

So then why doesn't Putin get rid of those 10,000 nuclear missiles aimed at the US?

[Timber Rattler]

So says Sputnik News, i.e. Russian State Media, eh?

[NavyShoe]

So then why doesn’t Putin get rid of those 10,000 nuclear missiles aimed at the US?

---

Same reason we don’t get rid of ours. Hegemonic peace through strength.

[KittyKares]

I will be watching tomorrow.

[PeterPrinciple]

“His stance is by no means pro-Russian and it is not pro-Ukrainian – rather, it is pro-American,” the spokesman said. “But at least it differs from the stance of all these traditional Anglo-Saxon media.”

---

That is a good reason.

[FarCenter]

Any estimates on how long the table was?

[mac_truck]

The EUroReich wants to place “sanctions” on Carlson for having the temerity to interview the Russian President.

[TornadoAlley3]

Most are anti Russian and anti American. It's all about themselves and what they believe. No neutrality in the news business. These people are actors, paid to entertain, never to inform.

[1Old Pro]

Pescov seems to be showing some deference to Carlson. The other thread on this was oddly interpreted as quite the opposite.

[usconservative]

I am all for literally ANYTHING that gets the enemedia’s panties in a knot.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Because Carlson lets his guests talk unlike a bunch of other interviewers.

[tlozo]

[tlozo]

As Carlson gets celebrity treatment in Moscow, Russia just extended the detention of American journalist Alsu Kurmasheva & Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich. Those defending Carlson should reflect on why Carlson is getting unfettered access while others get detained.

[TheBattman]

Other Western media have requested to interview Putin, and not just “pro-Ukraine” media. There is a reason the Kremlin said yes to Tucker, and I’m afraid it reveals something about Carlson that many on the Right seem to be blind to...

Also - the fact that Carlson is not particularly honest -

[lodi90]

“We’ve lodged several requests with the Kremlin in the last 18 months. Always a ‘no’ for us,” BBC’s Steve Rosenberg wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter), disputing Carlson’s previous claim that “no Western journalist has bothered to interview” the Russian leader.

---

Tucker lies so breezily while he spoon feeds ignorant viewers his chosen narrative of the day.