Posted on 02/06/2024 2:17:18 PM PST by Eleutheria5
Elections and other political processes are pivotal to the quality of a country’s governance. Elections can either greatly advance or set back a country’s long-term democratic development, as well as U.S. foreign policy priorities. The most fundamental principle defining credible elections is that they must reflect the free expression of the will of the people. To achieve this, elections should be transparent, inclusive, and trusted by voters and those elected. There have been several questionable elections. In 1876, Republican Rutherford B. Hayes won against Democrat Samuel J. Tilden in an election marred by voter fraud, and violence. But the 2020 election took it to a new level. Written and hosted by Colin D. Heaton.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Government-Funded Entities Are Building a Network to Flag “Misinformation” in Private Messages...reports are now emerging about companies getting hired to make massive databases of supposedly unlawful speech that are compiled thanks to users effectively spying and reporting on each other on messaging platforms like WhatsApp.
Former State Department official, now executive director of Foundation For Freedom Online, Mike Benz, calls this “a snitch network of citizen informants.” Information thus obtained is then analyzed using some form of AI, resulting in identification of “misinformation trends.”
Good, but he is wrong on PA.
Act 77, i.e., universal mail in voting, was passed by the RINO controlled state legislature, in Oct, 2019, even before covid showed up.
while it is true that Act 77 was passed by the state legislature, it seems to have violated the PA state constitution’s requirements on absentee voting. The second highest court in PA found that Act 77 was unconstitutional on that basis.
The Commonwealth Court, in a 3-2 January decision, found that the Pennsylvania Constitution requires voters to appear at the polls in person unless they have one of a number of excuses specified in amendments that allow voting by absentee ballot. The opinion cited two cases both more than 100 years old.
In the opinion by the Supreme Court majority, Justice Christine Donohue wrote the courts were interpreting a version of that constitution that predated Pennsylvania’s voter registration laws when “arguably, the only way to verify an individual’s qualifications to vote in an election district was to allow his neighbors to identify him as qualified.”
Pennsylvania's mail-in voting law has been upheld by the state's Supreme Court, allowing all voters in the key swing state to cast ballots by mail in November and for other future elections.
In a 5-2 decision released Tuesday, the Democratic-majority court overturned a lower court's ruling from January that found Pennsylvania's Act 77 to be in violation of the state's constitution.
"We find no restriction in our Constitution on the General Assembly's ability to create universal mail-in voting," Justice Christine Donohue wrote in the majority opinion.
I knew that it was passed unconstitutionally, but didn't hear about the court ruling.
If there is no universal mail in voting and we go back to in person, PDJT will win, in a landslide, again.
Thanks for that update, I was not aware of this subsequent ruling. Let us hope that we can at least have some of the PA election irregularities and outright fraud that was detailed in this report prepared for the Trump campaign.
Go to page 18 for what is alleged in PA.
Marching orders from the Davos crowd.
.bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.