Posted on 02/02/2024 10:15:20 AM PST by Braak
The narrative she had heard and absorbed was that if you don’t transition, you’ll kill yourself.
Yes, I DID leave you alone.
I referred to my own experience and observation, and stand by everything I wrote. I still don’t know anybody who has been harmed by the shots, and conversely I’m acquainted with people who never took them and never contracted Covid.
I’ve seen how absolutely vicious a number of people here have been toward those who took it or defended their taking of it, so I don’t bring the subject up. You are the one who brought it up on a thread about a completely different issue; because you wanted to argue and vent about it.
You remind me exactly of vicious Leftists who find ‘shameful’ anyone who doesn’t agree with THEM. They seek to ridicule and even destroy them.
You are no better than they are.
I tried to read NYT article, but couldn’t. I could read a couple of lines, before the ‘sign in to read’ prompt was downloaded. Twitchy’s article on this said, ‘read article’, so I will try their link, later.
===
This is what I said:
If it weren’t for the topic headline I would have thought you were talking about the Covid jabs given to children (and they still are, with silence from doctors).
I had no idea it would result in your tempest-in-a-teapot. As I said I was surprised you took my remark as some sort of insult. The parallel I cited was the first thought that popped into my head. I assumed you were not one of the pro-jabbers, because I can only think of maybe two or three posters here on FR that still don't understand what a threat to humanity these jabs really are -- or that still think (or maybe are paid to say) there is any valid reason to defend them. The rest of us are original resisters or converts.
As I said before I had to do a double-take on your first post since it sounded like a characterization of the jab rollout, and it does! If you were emotionally provoked by that simple observation that most decidedly DID NOT portray you as a jab supporter or put words in your mouth, then you are indeed defending the wrong hill -- an unexpected position in this forum.
Great one. Thanks for the link.
Really interesting. I made some hasty notes while I watched, looking for parallels between what the interviewed author Calley Means says about the Ozempic rollout, and what we know about the jab rollout.
That’s a video I’ll be watching again, and will recommend to friends.
1 - a bad drug, fast-tracked for rollout, with inappropriate age recommendations to the very young
2 - Ozempic is the Rosetta Stone of understanding corruption - reveals how pharma corrupts doctors, universities and government with cash and funding
3 - the media had no curiosity to discover the truth
4 - “follow the money” to learn the truth
5 - there is more profit in lifetime meds like Ozempic (similar to lifetime Covid boosters) that don’t actually cure the underlying metabolic issues responsible for bad health
6 - we were gaslighted by pharma - take a pill instead of address the metabolic issue
7 - it’s a metabolic health crisis - diabetes, obesity
8 - complaints about side effects are characterized as “anti-science”
9 - RFK Jr. and (sometimes) Trump are two of the few politicians with good ideas supporting human capital and potential
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.