Posted on 01/30/2024 5:49:46 PM PST by ChicagoConservative27
A recent episode of crime drama "Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" went viral after a White rape victim resisted testifying against her attacker because she's concerned he wouldn't get a fair trial due to his race.
In the January 25 episode "Truth Embargo," the character Natalie, played by actress Romina D'Ugo, is raped in a dressing room during a smash and grab robbery of a clothing store. At the hospital, Natalie denies seeing her rapist's face, despite video camera footage showing the man removing his mask before entering the dressing room.
(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...
Law & Order: Special WOKE Unit
“Another reason why I don’t watch TV”
Throwing the baby out with the bath water ...
She’s right. Trump didn’t get a fair trial. Much like Emmitt Till, Trump got lynched on the say so of a crazy white woman.
Sheez, talk about your bell curve.
No, no one ‘deserves’ that, but seriously, how moronic can a human be and still survive . . . ?
If you’re liberal, there is no bottom.
they’re out there, was one last year in the news...
Just more Hollywood propaganda appeasing their communist libturd overlords
Or maybe she didn’t really have an objection to being attacked?
Not really. The vast majority isn't worth watching. 🙂
Saw a guy in a TV interview who was robbed at gunpoint nearly apologize for calling the police given the grace risk had the police caught the criminal.
Muslims gab rape in Europe and it’s not investigated or forgiven as they don’t realize women can say no or to do so would be racist.
“Not really. The vast majority isn’t worth watching.”
Yes, really. You are throwing out the good with the bad.
“”White rape victim resisted testifying against her attacker because she’s concerned he wouldn’t get a fair trial due to his race.””
OK.
There would be two outcomes for putting it on trial.
1 Not Guilty: More than fair since she describes it as “her attacker.”
2 Guilty: Fair because she describes it as “her attacker” and knows it is guilty.
But that is not the correct virtue signal the writers of the show want.
.
In the show she will get what she wants either way, but that is not “correct” for the white rape victim.
She wants to let him go because “the system” will actually put it on trial.
And THIS is what the prog wants the world to do, based on their belief that a true virtual signal is ignoring rape and murder from illegal alien animals.
.
Unfortunately saw it, sometimes it isn’t worth going to war with the wife. Of course the victim was a lesbian. Her and the Wife / Girlfriend were very attractive. So it becomes even more unbelievable as the episode drags on. Of course the main characters of the show have empathy for her, basically agreeing that Cops / the system are not fair / racist. The victim after some arm twisting final takes the stand and testifies against the Black rapist.
I mostly watch old movies, but most of the remainder is junk of some form or another. I used to watch OAN too, but then they removed that. Fox I left long ago
Progressive Stockholm Syndrome.
All the more reason to boycott and starve the beast.
Just sucking up to the total Madison Avenue agenda.
I tell you, just when you think it can’t get any lower.
A woman, because of her race, deserved to be raped and the rapist, because of his race, deserves to escape justice because of his race.
And this was actually put on the air.
Don’t subscribe to services which carry the stations. They rake in cash whether you watch or not. If you watch the station on air they can only make money if they get ratings from actual viewers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.