Posted on 01/26/2024 1:47:32 PM PST by janetjanet998
Trump must pay $ 83.3 MILLION to E. Jean Carroll for defamation, a federal jury has ruled
I bet he pays nothing.
And keeping your mouth shut doesn't stop this wackjob lunatic from accusing you of rape.
So denial of an accusation is libelous?
You take issue with the wrong foe. Any system that works like this court in New York is an evil system.
Oh boo-hoo.
I'm beyond sick to DEATH of weaklings like you.
She's being bankrolled by the likes of Reid Hoffman.
She’s sealed her pathetic fate.
“Nope not a dime....would I pay!”
At the end of the day if there’s a judgment against you, you won’t have a choice in that matter.
She claims to have been raped in a *store* during shopping hours.
It is pathetic threats like that "this lady" used in court to beef up the charge against President Trump.
Republicans dont know how to play the lawfare game yet. Hopefully they figure it out. Sue in Tennessee for defamation. A jury of 12 MAGA and sue for 84 million. Quick judgment. I hope SOMEONE on thr “right” will fight back against this crap!
OJ jury with no sense of proportion or reality. This is what Democrats do. Even the politicized judge knows he is going to have to reduce the ridiculous award or else it will be thrown out on appeal. Good thing they were not a politicized jury. /sarc
He won’t pay that much. But he will pay a bunch. It pays to keep your mouth shut.
Of course the nevertrumpers would want Trump to be quiet.
They don’t want Trump to defend himself, and want the lies from his attackers go unchallenged as truth, and make him appear guilty.
As the general election get closer, watch various nevertrumpers push that it would be better to elect a dem to office, rather than Trump, saying Trump would be all about going after his attackers.
Well, he should, as the unlawful use of justice should concern everyone....
Well, I guess the nevertrumpers don’t care, as long as it’s against Trump.
Yea, like this is a real trial
Supposedly the dress she claimed to have worn during the hoax incident didn’t even exist at that time.
“the stuff I read on FR from alleged conservatives is very disturbing.”
Some of these folks are nowhere near conservative. And they would like us all to keep our mouths shut. That’s what all these lawsuits are about.
That's the real travesty ... the creative nature of this whole vindictive prosecution.
Ridiculous! But not a surprise!
The dress that E. Jean Carroll — the woman who has sued former President Donald Trump for defamation for denying her claims that he sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the early 1990’s — claims she wore during the alleged attack did not exist at the time, Trump’s lawyer pointed out.
very strong evidence [not].
E. Jean Carroll posed for the cover of New York Magazine in June 2019. She was wearing what she claimed was the Donna Karan jacket dress she had worn when Donald Trump allegedly attacked her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in 1994. She later was forced to change her story after New York Magazine pointed out that the dress she said she was wearing was not sold in 1994. Carroll later claimed the alleged attack occurred in 1995 or 1996. But she is still not clear on the date it took place. Carroll said she met Trump on the street and they decided to go buy lingerie at the high-end New York City department store before the attack. The entire story lacks credibility.
New York Magaine said on its cover, “The jacket dress she was wearing that day has hung in her closet ever since; she wore it again for the first time for her portrait with New York.”
E. Jean Carroll wrote her bizarre story in New York Magazine in June 2019. Carroll said she kept the dress in her closet after the alleged assault. She says she never wore it again and that, “I have never had sex with anybody ever again.”
She even held a photo shoot with New York Magazine in the dress.
But there was one big problem with this woman’s story. The Donna Karan jacket dress was not even made or sold in 1994. The story is a complete hoax.
A woman accuses you of raping her then YOU DENY IT..
PAY UP?
Time to investigate WHO is picking these judges and/or juries? I THOUGHT THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DETERMINED AT RANDOM FOR JUDGES, then AGREED UPON BY BOTH SIDES FOR JURIES.
WTF IS HAPPENING TO OUR COUNTRY?
I read that the dress she claimed to be wearing at the time of the “incident” hadn’t been produced yet
Sounds like a plan!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.