That I understand her speech at that church, the principles of girl power for women of color requires they not be accountable for any moral failings and public corruption on the road to “changing the world.” I have to admit find that persuasive /s
It’s buzzword croutons in a Word Salad........................
The original attempt to remove her from the case - to get the case thrown out actually- came from one of the co-defendants. But after Fani made that speech in church, Trump’s lawyers jumped in saying she is injecting race relations into the case. They had various arguments why this is improper but to me this appears an attempt to corrupt the jury pool. Prosecutors need to be totally above reproach. There is now a legitimate question whether the defendants can get a fair trial if the jurors think the prosecutor is the victim. If she had any principles she would recuse herself entirely, right away.
I wonder if all this is enough to cause a big delay in the trial, if it doesn’t shut it down entirely (which seems unlikely). I also wonder if some of the defendants who took plea deals may seek to unwind them. Though that would probably be risky for them.
How do you write women so well?
I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.