Skip to comments.
Ukraine's top general wanted a bold counteroffensive a year earlier that the US thought was too risky. It might have reshaped the war.
Business Insider ^
| Jan 9, 2024
| Chris Panella and Ryan Pickrell
Posted on 01/13/2024 3:37:00 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
Ukraine's forces slammed against stiff Russian defenses in southern Ukraine this summer, and ultimately, the counteroffensive failed. Unable to get the US onboard earlier, the move in a critical sector of southern Ukraine came a year later than when the country's top general first wanted to make it, a new book reports.
Had it come when he wanted, it might have reshaped the war, for better or worse.
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Gen. Valery Zaluzhny pushed for a bold, and by some observations risky, counteroffensive in 2022 that never came to be, according to the new book "Our Enemies Will Vanish" by Yaroslav Trofimov, the Wall Street Journal's chief foreign-affairs correspondent.
It was a plan to punch through parts of Zaporizhzhia and sever the so-called "land bridge" to isolate Russian forces in Crimea.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
TOPICS: Ukraine
KEYWORDS: chrispanella; couldawouldashoulda; ryanpickrell; strategy; ukraine; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: MinorityRepublican
“Might have”
That’s when you’re winning.
2
posted on
01/13/2024 4:07:01 PM PST
by
EEGator
To: MinorityRepublican
Ukraine's top general wanted a bold counteroffensive a year earlier that the US thought was too risky.Two years from now the "Business Insider" will be "reporting" that Zelensky "wanted a bold Nuclear counteroffensive a year earlier that the US thought was too risky".
The only difference is that more Ukrainians will be dead.
3
posted on
01/13/2024 4:09:17 PM PST
by
Navy Patriot
(Celebrate Decivilization)
To: MinorityRepublican
4
posted on
01/13/2024 4:09:27 PM PST
by
glorgau
To: glorgau
On The Waterfront- Terry Malloy
5
posted on
01/13/2024 4:10:16 PM PST
by
EEGator
To: MinorityRepublican
Also:
“A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week.” - George S. Patton
6
posted on
01/13/2024 4:11:06 PM PST
by
glorgau
To: MinorityRepublican
Sure. Bad strategy is the reason Ukraine is losing not the fact they are facing a military vastly superior with far more firepower.
Ukraine is totalitarian hellhole that just murdered an American citizen. It not only deserves to die, it must die.
7
posted on
01/13/2024 4:20:52 PM PST
by
Kazan
To: glorgau
Valery Zaluzhny and Volodymyr Zelenskyy should have gone for it. The Americans may b***h and moan. But what are they going to do? They should probably have asked Netanyahu for advice on how to handle the Americans.
The Americans may threaten to cut you off but sometimes you have to call them out on it.
To: MinorityRepublican
Too bad they listen to US military brass.
9
posted on
01/13/2024 4:24:35 PM PST
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: MinorityRepublican
Ukraine would already be speaking Russian if those “Ukrainian generals” were left to their own devices. What a line o’crap. Wait, a lot of Ukraine already does speak Russian.
To: MinorityRepublican
Ukraine's forces slammed against stiff Russian defenses in southern Ukraine this summer, and ultimately, the counteroffensive failed.
It didn't help that Ukraine announced the counteroffensive six months in advance. It gave Russian army engineers plenty of time to build fortifications.
To: Right_Wing_Madman
It didn't help that Ukraine announced the counteroffensive six months in advance.By that time, Ukraine should have called off the counteroffensive. Even though the West was pressuring Ukraine to do something.
To: MinorityRepublican
The Ukes would have never been able to secure the land bridge to Crimea. Too much territory that would require two fronts. They would have never made it to Melitopol.
13
posted on
01/13/2024 4:59:22 PM PST
by
NavyShoe
To: MinorityRepublican
Would have been more informative if the “journalist” here identified the source who asked for the post.
14
posted on
01/13/2024 5:14:59 PM PST
by
nicollo
("This is FR!")
To: McCarthysGhost
YouCrayne’s would already be Russian lamp shades if not for Uncle Sam
15
posted on
01/13/2024 5:15:38 PM PST
by
tennmountainman
( (“Less propaganda would be appreciated.” JimRob 12-2-2023 DITTO)
To: MinorityRepublican
If my aunt had testicles she might have been my uncle.
But Biden didn't did he, why is that? Could he really be assisting Russia instead?
To: glorgau
“I coulda been a contender.” President Zelensky
17
posted on
01/13/2024 5:35:30 PM PST
by
House Atreides
(I’m now ULTRA-MAGA. -PRO-MAX)
To: MinorityRepublican
Monday morning quarterbacking?
18
posted on
01/13/2024 5:41:29 PM PST
by
McGruff
(Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
To: MinorityRepublican
I bet the Ukes are glad they waited. Why jump into a risky offensive when you can wait and have DC plan and pay for the catastrophic so called counter offensive?
19
posted on
01/13/2024 5:42:27 PM PST
by
hardspunned
(Former DC GOP globalist stooge)
To: Kazan
Ukraine is losing not the fact they are facing a military vastly superior with far more firepower.True. But the Russians were on the run in 2022. Ukraine should have seized the initiative. They didn't do that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson