Supreme Court to decide whether cities can ban homeless from public areas

Fox News ^ | 01/13/2024 | Brie Stimson

[FlingWingFlyer]

Why don’t the azhoes let the American people decide that.

[Pollard]

The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a case involving whether cities in Western states can ban homeless people from sleeping in public areas.

But would not hear any case about election fraud in a presidential election. Which one's more of a Federal/National concern?

[eyeamok]

Camping on public property should only be legal within 100 yards of the personal residence of any public servant or officer of the court.

[thegagline]

Why don’t the azhoes let the American people decide that.

Because that is not the way the Constitution works. That said, I don’t think the 8th amendment is applicable in this case.

[thegagline]

Camping on public property should only be legal within 100 yards of the personal residence of any public servant or officer of the court.

I like the way you think.

[Red Badger]

If it’s a Public Health and Safety issue I believe they can.................

[Political Junkie Too]

Fox News now wants email IDs to read their news articles on their website?

Forget it.

-PJ

[Political Junkie Too]

I don't see how this is an 8th amendment issue.

Punishments are for convictions in a trial; legislated bans, curfews, or other restrictions on use of public property are not punishments.

Next they will argue that requiring permits to protest on public property are violations of the 8th amendment, too.

-PJ

[Yogafist]

Supreme Court to decide whether cities can ban homeless vagrants from public areas

There, fixed it.

[Navy Patriot]

Supreme Court to decide whether cities can ban homeless from public areas

This is going to be fun.

[willk]

“Supreme Court to decide whether cities can ban homeless vagrants from public areas
There, fixed it.”

Supreme Court to decide whether cities can ban bums from public areas
There, fixed it.

[thinden]

Move um to the burbs

[thegagline]

Paywall, no more

https://archive.vn/mWh6q

[qwerty1234]

perfect play by those lefty states - throw it to the SC, if the SC says they can’t move them, it is the SC’s fault - and if they say they can, it is those far-right justices on the SC that made them do it.

Heads they win, tails we lose.

[frank ballenger]

Will end up having the homeless ban the Supreme Court.

[frogjerk]

So loitering is going to be edjudicated?

[Brian Griffin]

If I was to pitch a tent and live on Supreme Court grounds I would not be there for long.

[ThisLittleLightofMine]

If states would stop giving homeless money, ssdi and stop funding non profits that “support” homeless in addition to o making it illegal to give to panhandlers it would resolve itself. As well building more krisons and prosecuting crimes. We are a lawless nation.

[exnavy]

We need to cut off the money to the feral government.