Posted on 01/13/2024 8:54:58 AM PST by Twotone
I believe it reasonable to expect that Google has representatives at Davos, and they do know what is planned.
Plans do not usually work out quite as expected. So, it would be also correct to say that "Google does not know what's coming exactly". They really do not know - exactly.
Sorry, while the Davos set like to think that they have the future well planned. Nobody does. Carl von Clauswitz, a Prussian philosopher of war who witnessed and survived the chaotic 20+ year period of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, noted that international relations, specifically war, are shaped by three interactive forces: rational policy decisions, peoples emotions, and random chance (unpredictable events like weather that are out of the control of nations / individuals).
Plans are attempts to predict events with little to know hard facts, just a boatload of assumptions that planners try to confirm or deny over time.
President Eisenhower said it best:
"I tell this story to illustrate the truth of the statement I heard long ago in the Army: Plans are worthless, but planning is everything. There is a very great distinction because when you are planning for an emergency you must start with this one thing: the very definition of “emergency” is that it is unexpected, therefore it is not going to happen the way you are planning."
Outside our Lord, who doesn't share his planning very often, no one is in control.
Google is constantly blocking anything favorable to Trump.
Try this, I didn’t watch Trump’s Fox town hall this week. I’ve been trying to find it online but can’t find the full town hall meeting anywhere using Google.
That is insane. Please prove me wrong and send a link.
Catherine Herridge (CBS, CIA, spook) recently made the claim that there would be a black swan event this year.
Hey, Google, why don’t you just report verifiable information and let us decide what it means or what to believe instead of manipulating reactions?
The Davos set believes they have a well-planned future that is under their control. They are wrong on both counts. But they will not choose to change their beliefs, and they will act on them.
That is the most important point of all.
They are going to do stupid things that do not work, and they will keep doing them until they cannot do them anymore.
Google executives consider themselves part of the inner-circle decision makers. Another mistaken belief. But they are going to conceal the clever plans of the Davos bunch to the extent they are aware of them. And especially when the clever plans fail, they will conceal news of those failures.
The elites are unleashing monsters which they will not be able to control or put back in their cages. Most of all, Google is telling us they will conceal news of any such rampages to the extent that they are able.
Google keeps adding more features purportedly intended to make searching easier, but these “helpers” are increasingly manipulative and seem designed to steer you to Google’s preferred “authorities” and narratives. Sometimes you have to really fight to get to the information you want to see, rather than the information that Google wants you to see.
Yahoo
If you look at the metadata, you’ll see that Google’s policy statement originated in Langley, VA.
You didn't find "THIS article" on a Google search engine result, did you? Google is the internet's biggest filter of conservative information.
Does Google “know”? Unlikely. Loose lips sink ships.
Has Google been told repeatedly, “Don’t sweat it. We’ve got this. It’s Newsom or Haley. Nothing to worry about”.
Never use it. I spent half a day once going through everything on my computer that had Google or Chrome, etc. related to it.
I don’t use google and it’s readily available.
They’re in on it.
They aren’t building dozens of these mega-warehouses around here for no reason.
I think they’re for when they nationalize food production. They’ve already got billions of dollars into the industry, what with EBT, free school lunch, etc.
Thanks but that link doesn’t work if you don’t have cable, which I do not. I have internet only.
Sorry for the late response but I didn't see your post until now. The point isn't whether you can see this thread. You found it because you are a long time member here. The issue is that Google, as the world's dominant search engine, can prevent other people from ever finding it. So, you cursing at the statement “The company controls the flow of information and can amplify or bury stories on a whim” demonstrates that you don't understand how the vast majority of people find information. Their decision to filter information is a threat to our democracy. Your antiquated e-mail chains and isolated discussion forums are all but irrelevant. We have lost elections and will continue to lose elections unless we fix this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.