Posted on 01/10/2024 1:41:25 AM PST by Red Badger
“But I’m looking at my men and women having their asses handed to them and my first thought was, ‘f*ck it”
I’d like to see the video of his people getting their assess “handed” to them.
Lying old battleaxe
Nancy is so old she doesn’t know the internet is forever.
Cupid Stunt.
Historical revisionism at its perigee...
Hysterical woman exemplified...
*
Hysterical woman at he apogee..............................
By Jan 6 it was too late. She refused Capitol Police Chief Sund’s three requests for additional resources prior to Jan 6.
“WE ALL KNOW NANCY IS A LYING SOB.
She is a disgrace to talented women who are not CORRUPT, and she exposes herself everyday.”
At the risk of redundancy.... I challenge you to name one high-profile Democrat that is not a lying, corrupt SOB. I ask because I can’t think of a single one.
House Speaker Pelosi says she spoke to top U.S. general about restraining Trump
(a snip from the link:)
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi spoke to the top U.S. military commander on Friday about taking precautions to ensure that Republican President Donald Trump cannot initiate hostilities or order a nuclear strike in his remaining 12 days in office.
Pelosi said in a letter to Democratic lawmakers that she spoke to Army General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, about what measures are available to rein in the Republican president. Trump, angry about his election loss, incited supporters in the days before an invasion of the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.
"The situation of this unhinged president could not be more dangerous, and we must do everything that we can to protect the American people from his unbalanced assault on our country and our democracy," Pelosi said in a letter to colleagues.
While Pelosi's letter highlights the concern among lawmakers about what Trump may try to do during his remaining time in office, there are questi
No. Bowser and Pelosi met face-to-face. Pelosi specifically stated to Bowser that she rejected an offer of 10,000 National Guard troops because, "They're not under my control".
Proof? Here is Bowser inexplicably rejecting any additional security -- as it turned out, at Pelosi's direction.
The media will never demand proof of what she says.
Not more than once anyways......................
And I’m the king of England.
(I use to be the queen of England)
Pronoun is “Your majesty.”
5.56mm
The guard were AUTHORIZED by Trump days earlier. The letter was presented in Kash Patel’s testimony in Colorado case.
There’s also evidence Bowser refused them except for 340 to handle traffic and it seems from all indications that Natzi did refuse guard troops until much later for CYA purposes in the afternoon when the event was likely over.
“On Thursday evening, when McCarthy first tweeted asking Pelosi and Schumer why the Guard members were quartered in the garage, his spokesperson Michele Exner told CNN that ‘both Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer oversee and ultimately are responsible for the Capitol’s administrative matters’.”
https://www.cnn.com/factsfirst/politics/factcheck_6572efad-c0c8-461b-9f26-1020801703db
The decision on whether to call National Guard troops to the Capitol is made by what is known as the Capitol Police Board, which is made up of the House Sergeant at Arms, the Senate Sergeant at Arms and the Architect of the Capitol. The board decided not to call the guard ahead of the insurrection but did eventually request assistance after the rioting had already begun, and the troops arrived several hours later.
ADVERTISEMENT
“The House Sergeant at Arms reports to Pelosi and the Senate Sergeant at Arms reported to McConnell, a Republican who was then Senate Majority Leader. There is no evidence that either directed the security officials not to call the guard beforehand, and Hammill said after the insurrection that Pelosi was never informed of such a request.”
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-235651652542
“Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the “optics” of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.”
“Documents provided by [current] House Sergeant at Arms show how then-House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving carried out his duties in clear deference to the Speaker, her staff, and other Democratic staff . . .
“House Rules dictate . . . that the Sergeant at Arms is to report directly to the Speaker of the House.”
https://nypost.com/2022/12/21/house-gop-report-faults-nancy-pelosi-for-jan-6-security-failures/
NOT AUTHORIZED to enter the grounds the bitch kept them at bay to play put her script the way things happened.
She owns Jan6 event 100% she refused the D.C. police request 5 times.
The democrats Act II was the bogus committee where nobody was allowed to defend them self and then records became lost (democrat trade mark).
There are multiple takes of that video as well...showing she was playing for the cameras and in CYA mode.
Fixed it
Yes I just posted it straight from Patel's site.
"it seems from all indications that Natzi did refuse Guard troops until much later for CYA purposes in the afternoon when the event was likely over."
26,000 National Guardsmen marched into DC from J7 to the Installation, and were kept there until MEMORIAL DAY. Over 500M wasted in search of a #Narrative to paper over the soft military coup.
She may have begged for the National Guard on Jan 6 after the Capitol was entered. Trump offered it for days in advance, which is when you’re supposed to prevent disruptions. The dishonest establishment media will frame her quotes so that the public that only watches them will believe that Trump refused to send the National Guard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.