Posted on 01/06/2024 4:55:22 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man
In Nikki Haley’s case, it is well documented that neither one of her parents were citizens, natural born or naturalized, at the time of her birth in 1972. It has been previously reported that a South Carolina-based newspaper included a quote from the Office of Nikki Haley, stating that “her parents were not U.S. citizens at the time of her birth in 1972 and did not become citizens until 1978 and 2003.” Thus, although the parents may have been lawful residents at the time of her birth on South Carolina soil, which may or may not confer her with the privileges of citizenship, it is important to note that she does not qualify for the Constitution’s higher requirement of natural-born citizenship.
(Excerpt) Read more at granitegrok.com ...
Time has come to acknowledge Harvard is against US.. Romney, Barry Sureto, Jackie Smith, Raphael Cruz. And Ron Duh-Saintis..
She blew by DeSantis in the betting before she became the GOPe darling.
Ron is now 48/1 and needed no aid plummeting fr his pre-campaign 7/2.
If he said the right things he would still be the solid third choice behind Trump & Biden.
When you get right down to it, the mindless chatter from NBC kooks that Nikki, Obama, Kamala, Vivek, etc. are not eligible is just a smokescreen for their blatant racism.
Post 16 was a perfect example. While it was zotted, we can see many replies that reference what was said.
Racists.
Don’t waste your time with these clowns.
Which is completely at odds with the 1866 Civil Rights Act from which the amendment was derived.
“All persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States.”
The first two subsequent cases, the Supreme Court addressed the issue, first in dicta in The Slaughter-House Cases, and then as a holding in Elk v. Wilkins.
But it’s an open and shut case.
I couldn’t agree more-
posting Won Kim Ark ad infintum in a vacuum is a titanic waste of time.
The majority opinion in Slaughter-House “[t]he phrase, ’subject to its jurisdiction’ was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States.”
The first case off the amendment-
what racist clowns?!
Maybe posting Won Kim Ark again for the 31,817th time should end all discourse?
We should adheree to the Naturalization Act of 1790
America would be great again if we pushed this:
[The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to “free White person(s) ... of good character”, thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, enslaved people, free Africans, Pacific Islanders, and non-White Asians.]
There’s not a cotton pickin thing about the Naturalization Act of 1790 that’s racist.
Totally false.
Are you proud of your founders who wanted America to be a nation for WHITE citizens ONLY? I am!
[The Naturalization Act of 1790 (1 Stat. 103, enacted March 26, 1790) was a law of the United States Congress that set the first uniform rules for the granting of United States citizenship by naturalization. The law limited naturalization to “free White person(s) ... of good character”, thus excluding Native Americans, indentured servants, enslaved people, free Africans, Pacific Islanders, and Asians.]
This was Chet Arthur’s real problem, as it turns out. Although only with his not-yet-naturalized Irish father. Not with Moms tho (she was clean, a U.S. citty born and raised).
It is that.
Agreed. As the late great Bob Grant used to say, “It’s sick out there and getting sicker.”
nonsense
clown
mindless
There is no reason to believe that the founders wanted America to be for ‘white citizens only”-that is something the KKK would espouse...
Do you realize how many Americans of Spanish ancestry-aka Hispanic-whose families have been in America for a couple of centuries or more have some Native American DNA? I’m one of them. I’m Caucasian, some Hispanics are Black and a few are Asian-they are American-born, too-some for many generations. Native American isn’t a race, either-it is an ethnic group that is mixed Caucasian/Eurasian or Caucasian/Asian. Do you seriously suggest that none of those people should be in America, or be eligible to hold the highest elected office? I’ve never said this before-but your remarks sound downright racist to me...
sick
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.