Andrew L. Stigler: Would Ronald Reagan abandon Ukraine to Russia?

chicagotribune ^ | 01/04/2023 | Andrew L. Stigler

[ChicagoConservative27]

They have been digging Reagan a lot lately

[Darksheare]

He wouldn’t have instigated the war to begin with.

[G Larry]

Russia would never have invaded Ukraine in first place, under Reagan.

[Pete Dovgan]

Reagan would have never done the CIA coup thing in Ukraine that unfolded and changed the government. He would not have directly provoked Russia on it’s doorstep.

So no, Reagan would have never been in this position in the first place. Trump would have never allowed it to escalate. Only Obama-Biden would have picked this path.

[Seruzawa]

Dunno. He fought the USSR. And successfully. I don’t think he would defend Nazis, organ traffickers or human traffickers. So I’d guess no. He wouldn’t defend Ukraine

[Cincinnatus.45-70]

One problem. When Reagan was President, Ukraine WAS Russia and there had been no doubt of it for over 200 years.

[DesertRhino]

Reagan would have abhorred the Uke nazi movement.

[Scrambler Bob]

Would Regean have his money laundered in Ukrane, and then start the fight with Russia?

[JonPreston]

When I want Ronald Reagan takes, the first place I go is to Andrew L. Stigler & the Chicago Tribune.

[hanamizu]

Russia would never have invaded Ukraine in first place, under Reagan.

---

They wouldn’t have needed to. The Ukraine SSR was a proud part of the USSR and a voting member of the U.N.—the USSR got three votes in the UN, the USSR, Ukraine and Belarus.

[central_va]

This is not 1980’s America. We are no longer the “good guys”.

[ConservativeMind]

Reagan would NOT have defended Ukraine. He would have abided by the agreement with Russia and Ukraine.

Reagan also would not have approved all the NATO add-ons, in respect for that same agreement with Russia.

[JonPreston]

He fought the USSR. And successfully

This is my idea of fighting

[MNDude]

U.S. Secretary of State James Baker, gave assurances to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not expand into Eastern Europe following the reunification of Germany in 1990.

Ronald Reagan would be apologizing that Future NATO Leaders betrayed his wishes

[FlingWingFlyer]

Who cares. Stupid question. President Reagan isn’t around to make that decision. The question to ask is, What would O’Bonzo do? He’s not fond of white people.

[DesertRhino]

https://youtu.be/RVGFGmoltDs?t=28

Reagan is the new Randolph Scott for Ukrainiacs. Weird to see the establishment so reverent for Reagan now. They barely tolerated him then and made sure to saddle him with Bush.

And now they have adopted the left’s caricature of him and cast him as a warlike maniac.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

First, Ronaldous Magnus Reagan ouldve opposed the globohomopedos who are working to enslave the world…

… and Zeepers too.

[Firehath]

The evil empire

Is the lib dem 666usa

Thanks to marxist anti christ obama

And their spawn on the FR too

Rev 13

Brave new diversity world

The new world cutesy lamb

Horns of the old world tyranny - devil

Pc church / state fascism

Jihad - shariah

Gog = dems / taliban

Magog = nato / al queda

[OneVike]

Bad question, because Ukraine wasn’t in the 80’s what its today, and Ukraine isn’t even what it was in the 90s after the fall of the evil empire (Soviet Union). So the question is a practice in futility, because the whole geopolitical landscape of the world is completely different.

In two words?

Stupid question!

Its like the discussions asking if Kansas City Chiefs of the 2020s, would beat the Steelers of the 70s.

Who comes up with these stupid asinine questions?

I’ll answer that myself.

Those who are ignorant of historical facts.

[PIF]

Whatever - very nice New Year’s present from the Stupid Party for Vlad. He gets Ukraine on a platter, and can prepare to take Poland - as well as the Arctic north.