Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Declines to Fast-Track Trump Immunity Case
BBC ^ | 22nd December 2023, 12:44 PST

Posted on 12/22/2023 12:54:49 PM PST by nickcarraway

The US Supreme Court has declined, for now, to decide whether former president Donald Trump has immunity from prosecution for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 election.

Mr Trump's efforts to delay his trial appears successful, as the case must now work through the appeals process.

Special counsel Jack Smith had asked the court to take up the case in an expedited manner.

SNIP

The court did not explain its decision, instead issuing an unsigned order saying that Mr Smith's petition "is denied".

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: denied; dueprocess; harassment; immunity; persecution; scotus; smith; specialcounsel; trump

1 posted on 12/22/2023 12:54:49 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; rktman
Does anyone know if the Supreme Court declined to fast-track the Trump immunity case?

Thanks in advance.

2 posted on 12/22/2023 12:56:16 PM PST by kiryandil (The Biden: "Zelensky, we need to sit down and have a talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Can we read anything into this?


3 posted on 12/22/2023 12:57:11 PM PST by Churchillspirit (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit; rktman

That there will be another ten or twelve “Breaking News!” posts about this.


4 posted on 12/22/2023 12:58:28 PM PST by kiryandil (The Biden: "Zelensky, we need to sit down and have a talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Isn’t this the same case? Or was that sarcasm?


5 posted on 12/22/2023 12:59:29 PM PST by moonhawk (Unleash the MAGAhideen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Msybe Jack Smith will now include Supreme Court justices as part of his investigation.


6 posted on 12/22/2023 1:00:00 PM PST by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hadn’t heard a thing:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4205252/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4205254/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4205253/posts

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4205255/posts

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘


7 posted on 12/22/2023 1:04:07 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this๐Ÿ’ฉ? ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’‰! ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‘!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Jack Smith’s legal prowess is retard-level.

Smith won the initial ruling from Chutkan holding that Trump does not have presidential immunity for the charges.

Trump immediately appealed Chutkan’s decision, sending it to the appellate court; The question on presidential immunity is dispositive to the case, which effectively stays the legal process until the presidential immunity issue is resolved.

Jack-Jack didn’t like this delay in his persecution of bad-tweet-orange-man, so what does he do? He appeals the ruling that Chutkan issued in his favor.

How do you appeal a decision you won seeking to bypass the appellate process directly to SCOTUS?

You don’t.


8 posted on 12/22/2023 1:04:38 PM PST by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

See #7


9 posted on 12/22/2023 1:05:08 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this๐Ÿ’ฉ? ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’‰! ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‘!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Read it. That’s a completely different case. That one has nothing to do with Colorado.


10 posted on 12/22/2023 1:06:03 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

If a sitting president can be impeached for a crime that sort of implies a sitting president doesn’t have immunity, so he can be put on trial (unless the case is dismissed for lack or evidence or other cause).

If I were the judge, I’d toss Smith’s documents back at him and point to the door:
https://www.npr.org/2021/02/10/966396848/read-trumps-jan-6-speech-a-key-part-of-impeachment-trial


11 posted on 12/22/2023 1:25:07 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonhawk

https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4205264/posts?page=7#7


12 posted on 12/22/2023 1:36:27 PM PST by kiryandil (The Biden: "Zelensky, we need to sit down and have a talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

I can see that being a babylon bee headline:

After SCOTUS denies Jack Smith’s request, Jack Smith opens investigation into SCOTUS.


13 posted on 12/22/2023 1:36:57 PM PST by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman
And moar:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4205278/posts

ย ย 

"Proudly Posting Without Searching Since My FR Inception Date"


14 posted on 12/22/2023 1:44:21 PM PST by kiryandil (The Biden: "Zelensky, we need to sit down and have a talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

for-q-clinton FTTW


15 posted on 12/22/2023 1:44:48 PM PST by kiryandil (The Biden: "Zelensky, we need to sit down and have a talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

I know right. Because “search” ALWAYS works. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘


16 posted on 12/22/2023 1:52:56 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this๐Ÿ’ฉ? ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’‰! ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ๐Ÿ‘!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Mr Trump was indicted on election subversion charges earlier this year.”

The attorney is blatantly attempting to time his legal persecution to interfere with the 2024 presidential election to punish Trump for supposed election interference.

He’s committing the very crime he’s accusing Trump of.

Disgusting.


17 posted on 12/22/2023 6:29:19 PM PST by unlearner (I, Robot: I think I finally understand why Dr. Lanning created me... ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Jack Smith’s hope of getting SCOTUS involved early on assures there won’t be a trial until after the November elections.

Add up all the appellate filing deadlines, answers, rplys, eappealsfor rehearing at the D.C. Circuit; that will take at least three months. Then there would be a motion to reconsider. There goes another 2-4 months; at least.

Even if Trump were to lose at every step of the way in the Circuit Court, he has 90 days to file for a writ of certiorari at SCOTUS. Add in the special counsel answer and the defense reply; that’s another 3-4 months, then oral arguments have to be scheduled. Oral arguments won’t happen u til late June, or more likely next November after the election.

You can bet your ass none of the Justices want to hear this case prior to the election. When Trump wins, all these cases will be moot and just go away.

Even Jack Smith has to understand he isn’t e en going to be able to start a trial before the election.

Litigation over discovery is going to be a real bitch, and take a very long time; many months.

Bottom line is there aren’t going to be any criminal trials in D.C. or in Florids.


18 posted on 12/23/2023 12:13:34 AM PST by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson